
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.62 T | SHA-256 @ 1,008 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 56m 24s | - | |
| $17.59 B | Scrypt @ 2.82 PH/s | 592 MW | 1,255 confs | 21h 36m | 23x slower | |
| $9.23 B | SHA-256 @ 5.81 EH/s | 78 MW | 1,047 confs | 6d 19h | 174x slower | |
| $8.51 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 46 MW | 13,332 confs | 11d 13h | 295x slower | |
| $7.52 B | RandomX @ 5.86 GH/s | 36 MW | 10,416 confs | 14d 11h | 369x slower | |
| $4.34 B | Scrypt @ 2.62 PH/s | 550 MW | 490 confs | 23h 16m | 25x slower | |
| $1.41 B | Etchash @ 187 TH/s | 384 MW | 8,840 confs | 1d 9h | 35x slower | |
| $628.48 M | X11 @ 2.62 PH/s | 4.20 MW | 69,967 confs | 127d 3h | 3,246x slower | |
| $97.66 M | KawPow @ 2.16 TH/s | 10 MW | 72,189 confs | 50d 3h | 1,280x slower | |
| $91.89 M | RandomX @ 104 MH/s | 657 KW | 1,229,628 confs | 2y 81d | 20,712x slower | |
| $74.53 M | Eaglesong @ 126 PH/s | 6.13 MW | 807,943 confs | 87d 46m | 2,222x slower | |
| $248,084 | RandomX @ 470 KH/s | 2.96 KW | 1,678,352 confs | 493y 244d | 4,600,588x slower | |
| $67,485 | KawPow @ 719 MH/s | 3.54 KW | 433,583,784 confs | 412y 169d | 3,843,828x slower |