
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.28 T | SHA-256 @ 941 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 57m | - | |
| $12.97 B | Scrypt @ 3.01 PH/s | 632 MW | 1,091 confs | 19h 5m | 20x slower | |
| $7.94 B | Equihash @ 18 GH/s | 62 MW | 9,331 confs | 8d 2h | 205x slower | |
| $5.92 B | RandomX @ 5.81 GH/s | 36 MW | 10,152 confs | 13d 17h | 347x slower | |
| $4.00 B | SHA-256 @ 3.43 EH/s | 46 MW | 1,639 confs | 10d 20h | 275x slower | |
| $3.41 B | Scrypt @ 2.81 PH/s | 590 MW | 522 confs | 20h 26m | 22x slower | |
| $1.20 B | Etchash @ 191 TH/s | 391 MW | 8,258 confs | 1d 6h | 32x slower | |
| $474.05 M | X11 @ 3.26 PH/s | 5.23 MW | 53,278 confs | 96d 4h | 2,430x slower | |
| $79.62 M | RandomX @ 79 MH/s | 497 KW | 1,479,740 confs | 2y 280d | 25,528x slower | |
| $69.01 M | KawPow @ 1.71 TH/s | 8.41 MW | 86,162 confs | 59d 20h | 1,512x slower | |
| $52.22 M | Eaglesong @ 101 PH/s | 4.94 MW | 809,942 confs | 101d 19h | 2,572x slower | |
| $129,501 | RandomX @ 413 KH/s | 2.60 KW | 11,081,346 confs | 529y 325d | 4,886,161x slower | |
| $63,470 | KawPow @ 280 MH/s | 1.38 KW | 1,047,431,807 confs | 996y 151d | 9,187,998x slower |