
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.33 T | SHA-256 @ 944 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 56m 48s | - | |
| $13.62 B | Scrypt @ 2.27 PH/s | 476 MW | 1,448 confs | 1d 1h | 27x slower | |
| $8.62 B | Equihash @ 15 GH/s | 52 MW | 11,061 confs | 9d 14h | 243x slower | |
| $6.59 B | RandomX @ 5.33 GH/s | 33 MW | 10,352 confs | 14d 23h | 380x slower | |
| $4.52 B | SHA-256 @ 3.23 EH/s | 43 MW | 1,578 confs | 11d 13h | 293x slower | |
| $3.54 B | Scrypt @ 2.58 PH/s | 542 MW | 495 confs | 22h 16m | 24x slower | |
| $1.17 B | Etchash @ 188 TH/s | 386 MW | 8,302 confs | 1d 7h | 33x slower | |
| $488.31 M | X11 @ 2.21 PH/s | 3.54 MW | 78,747 confs | 142d 4h | 3,605x slower | |
| $80.52 M | RandomX @ 76 MH/s | 480 KW | 1,506,640 confs | 2y 316d | 26,525x slower | |
| $73.35 M | KawPow @ 1.70 TH/s | 8.36 MW | 85,223 confs | 60d 4h | 1,525x slower | |
| $56.99 M | Eaglesong @ 84 PH/s | 4.12 MW | 1,056,193 confs | 122d 5h | 3,099x slower | |
| $113,603 | RandomX @ 1.94 MH/s | 12 KW | 5,097,201 confs | 112y 239d | 1,042,473x slower | |
| $60,936 | KawPow @ 843 MH/s | 4.15 KW | 348,710,330 confs | 331y 264d | 3,069,633x slower |