
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.26 T | SHA-256 @ 1,017 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 56m 30s | - | |
| $13.18 B | Scrypt @ 3.13 PH/s | 657 MW | 1,125 confs | 19h 41m | 21x slower | |
| $7.74 B | Equihash @ 18 GH/s | 60 MW | 10,370 confs | 8d 21h | 226x slower | |
| $6.17 B | RandomX @ 5.71 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,078 confs | 15d 2m | 382x slower | |
| $4.73 B | SHA-256 @ 3.69 EH/s | 49 MW | 1,612 confs | 10d 19h | 276x slower | |
| $3.45 B | Scrypt @ 2.65 PH/s | 556 MW | 594 confs | 23h 15m | 25x slower | |
| $1.14 B | Etchash @ 186 TH/s | 381 MW | 9,083 confs | 1d 9h | 36x slower | |
| $453.52 M | X11 @ 2.37 PH/s | 3.80 MW | 78,540 confs | 141d 19h | 3,614x slower | |
| $71.94 M | RandomX @ 69 MH/s | 437 KW | 1,772,842 confs | 3y 136d | 31,378x slower | |
| $64.06 M | KawPow @ 1.70 TH/s | 8.35 MW | 92,914 confs | 64d 12h | 1,644x slower | |
| $46.92 M | Eaglesong @ 67 PH/s | 3.29 MW | 1,659,893 confs | 163d 23h | 4,180x slower | |
| $89,414 | RandomX @ 402 KH/s | 2.54 KW | 6,468,890 confs | 582y 129d | 5,417,456x slower | |
| $55,531 | KawPow @ 854 MH/s | 4.21 KW | 368,694,532 confs | 350y 268d | 3,262,783x slower |