
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.22 T | SHA-256 @ 984 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 54m 30s | - | |
| $11.80 B | Scrypt @ 2.04 PH/s | 428 MW | 1,612 confs | 1d 4h | 31x slower | |
| $6.93 B | Equihash @ 19 GH/s | 64 MW | 8,999 confs | 7d 19h | 206x slower | |
| $5.87 B | RandomX @ 5.11 GH/s | 32 MW | 10,636 confs | 15d 15h | 413x slower | |
| $3.82 B | SHA-256 @ 3.60 EH/s | 48 MW | 1,621 confs | 10d 8h | 274x slower | |
| $3.19 B | Scrypt @ 2.88 PH/s | 604 MW | 507 confs | 19h 59m | 22x slower | |
| $1.11 B | Etchash @ 192 TH/s | 394 MW | 8,147 confs | 1d 6h | 34x slower | |
| $428.31 M | X11 @ 2.81 PH/s | 4.51 MW | 61,353 confs | 111d 11h | 2,946x slower | |
| $78.22 M | RandomX @ 77 MH/s | 491 KW | 1,526,101 confs | 2y 294d | 27,068x slower | |
| $63.10 M | KawPow @ 1.63 TH/s | 8.02 MW | 91,901 confs | 62d 18h | 1,658x slower | |
| $46.91 M | Eaglesong @ 76 PH/s | 3.73 MW | 1,143,404 confs | 134d 22h | 3,565x slower | |
| $102,803 | RandomX @ 2.94 MH/s | 18 KW | 4,428,580 confs | 74y 207d | 719,136x slower | |
| $60,973 | KawPow @ 495 MH/s | 2.44 KW | 593,260,899 confs | 564y 133d | 5,442,761x slower |