
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.34 T | SHA-256 @ 980 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 58m 36s | - | |
| $13.90 B | Scrypt @ 2.62 PH/s | 549 MW | 1,323 confs | 23h 31m | 24x slower | |
| $8.90 B | SHA-256 @ 6.74 EH/s | 90 MW | 894 confs | 5d 22h | 146x slower | |
| $6.00 B | RandomX @ 5.98 GH/s | 37 MW | 11,132 confs | 14d 7h | 351x slower | |
| $4.03 B | Scrypt @ 2.74 PH/s | 575 MW | 539 confs | 22h 27m | 23x slower | |
| $3.96 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 44 MW | 13,880 confs | 12d 1h | 296x slower | |
| $1.23 B | Etchash @ 201 TH/s | 412 MW | 8,417 confs | 1d 7h | 32x slower | |
| $380.38 M | X11 @ 2.45 PH/s | 3.93 MW | 76,359 confs | 136d 23h | 3,366x slower | |
| $137.58 M | RandomX @ 132 MH/s | 836 KW | 976,442 confs | 1y 279d | 15,830x slower | |
| $91.04 M | KawPow @ 2.93 TH/s | 14 MW | 53,755 confs | 37d 7h | 917x slower | |
| $67.04 M | Eaglesong @ 120 PH/s | 5.86 MW | 645,242 confs | 91d 21h | 2,258x slower | |
| $244,887 | RandomX @ 11 MH/s | 71 KW | 1,255,636 confs | 20y 271d | 186,060x slower | |
| $93,415 | KawPow @ 2.37 GH/s | 11 KW | 132,810,723 confs | 126y 124d | 1,133,197x slower |