
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.26 T | SHA-256 @ 1,003 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 57m 18s | - | |
| $12.00 B | Scrypt @ 2.46 PH/s | 517 MW | 1,430 confs | 1d 1h | 26x slower | |
| $7.76 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 49 MW | 12,665 confs | 10d 23h | 276x slower | |
| $6.11 B | RandomX @ 5.43 GH/s | 34 MW | 11,554 confs | 15d 18h | 397x slower | |
| $4.57 B | SHA-256 @ 3.78 EH/s | 50 MW | 1,632 confs | 10d 13h | 266x slower | |
| $3.47 B | Scrypt @ 2.46 PH/s | 516 MW | 594 confs | 1d 1h | 26x slower | |
| $1.14 B | Etchash @ 183 TH/s | 375 MW | 9,243 confs | 1d 10h | 36x slower | |
| $459.06 M | X11 @ 2.83 PH/s | 4.54 MW | 65,724 confs | 118d 16h | 2,982x slower | |
| $68.88 M | RandomX @ 68 MH/s | 432 KW | 1,796,638 confs | 3y 152d | 31,355x slower | |
| $64.21 M | KawPow @ 1.70 TH/s | 8.39 MW | 94,092 confs | 64d 6h | 1,615x slower | |
| $46.84 M | Eaglesong @ 72 PH/s | 3.51 MW | 1,549,781 confs | 153d 10h | 3,856x slower | |
| $105,218 | RandomX @ 243 KH/s | 1.54 KW | 6,468,905 confs | 961y 158d | 8,819,009x slower | |
| $55,527 | KawPow @ 812 MH/s | 4.00 KW | 387,762,392 confs | 368y 319d | 3,383,616x slower |