
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.46 T | SHA-256 @ 884 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 7m | - | |
| $14.41 B | Scrypt @ 3.34 PH/s | 700 MW | 1,096 confs | 19h 10m | 17x slower | |
| $8.87 B | SHA-256 @ 6.44 EH/s | 86 MW | 967 confs | 6d 10h | 137x slower | |
| $6.32 B | RandomX @ 5.51 GH/s | 34 MW | 10,796 confs | 16d 2h | 344x slower | |
| $6.23 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 40 MW | 15,801 confs | 13d 17h | 293x slower | |
| $4.23 B | Scrypt @ 2.86 PH/s | 601 MW | 571 confs | 22h 21m | 20x slower | |
| $1.33 B | Etchash @ 204 TH/s | 418 MW | 8,558 confs | 1d 8h | 29x slower | |
| $589.70 M | X11 @ 2.57 PH/s | 4.13 MW | 74,591 confs | 135d 12h | 2,892x slower | |
| $112.62 M | RandomX @ 100 MH/s | 632 KW | 1,273,046 confs | 2y 154d | 18,860x slower | |
| $92.87 M | KawPow @ 2.39 TH/s | 11 MW | 67,423 confs | 47d 14h | 1,015x slower | |
| $82.06 M | Eaglesong @ 142 PH/s | 6.91 MW | 565,055 confs | 80d 23h | 1,728x slower | |
| $249,993 | RandomX @ 634 KH/s | 3.99 KW | 1,304,191 confs | 383y 299d | 2,988,690x slower | |
| $87,801 | KawPow @ 1.88 GH/s | 9.26 KW | 174,001,146 confs | 165y 192d | 1,288,897x slower |