
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.24 T | SHA-256 @ 921 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 4m | - | |
| $12.90 B | Scrypt @ 3.17 PH/s | 665 MW | 1,154 confs | 20h 11m | 19x slower | |
| $6.88 B | Equihash @ 21 GH/s | 70 MW | 9,321 confs | 7d 23h | 177x slower | |
| $6.30 B | RandomX @ 5.17 GH/s | 32 MW | 11,792 confs | 17d 4h | 382x slower | |
| $3.89 B | SHA-256 @ 3.26 EH/s | 44 MW | 1,704 confs | 12d 16h | 282x slower | |
| $3.24 B | Scrypt @ 2.77 PH/s | 580 MW | 545 confs | 23h 9m | 21x slower | |
| $1.10 B | Etchash @ 168 TH/s | 344 MW | 10,322 confs | 1d 14h | 36x slower | |
| $433.16 M | X11 @ 2.45 PH/s | 3.94 MW | 78,209 confs | 142d 2h | 3,158x slower | |
| $81.53 M | RandomX @ 73 MH/s | 464 KW | 1,676,783 confs | 3y 108d | 26,739x slower | |
| $66.76 M | KawPow @ 1.90 TH/s | 9.34 MW | 86,304 confs | 59d 22h | 1,332x slower | |
| $51.57 M | Eaglesong @ 77 PH/s | 3.77 MW | 1,300,458 confs | 148d 14h | 3,302x slower | |
| $136,445 | RandomX @ 4.04 MH/s | 25 KW | 4,282,731 confs | 60y 108d | 489,077x slower | |
| $55,518 | KawPow @ 774 MH/s | 3.82 KW | 422,208,537 confs | 401y 235d | 3,257,782x slower |