
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.42 T | SHA-256 @ 871 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 11m | - | |
| $14.69 B | Scrypt @ 1.47 PH/s | 307 MW | 2,561 confs | 1d 21h | 38x slower | |
| $9.20 B | SHA-256 @ 6.41 EH/s | 86 MW | 946 confs | 6d 18h | 136x slower | |
| $6.54 B | RandomX @ 5.58 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,488 confs | 16d 14h | 335x slower | |
| $4.26 B | Scrypt @ 2.66 PH/s | 558 MW | 520 confs | 1d 1h | 21x slower | |
| $3.45 B | Equihash @ 11 GH/s | 39 MW | 17,008 confs | 14d 23h | 301x slower | |
| $1.32 B | Etchash @ 204 TH/s | 417 MW | 8,976 confs | 1d 9h | 28x slower | |
| $409.12 M | X11 @ 2.73 PH/s | 4.37 MW | 73,502 confs | 133d 13h | 2,690x slower | |
| $121.62 M | RandomX @ 164 MH/s | 1.04 MW | 869,198 confs | 1y 198d | 11,346x slower | |
| $87.10 M | KawPow @ 3.57 TH/s | 17 MW | 47,785 confs | 33d 4h | 668x slower | |
| $75.33 M | Eaglesong @ 108 PH/s | 5.25 MW | 907,018 confs | 111d 4h | 2,239x slower | |
| $262,550 | RandomX @ 3.22 MH/s | 20 KW | 2,529,711 confs | 78y 340d | 580,241x slower | |
| $101,108 | KawPow @ 2.34 GH/s | 11 KW | 146,175,754 confs | 139y 20d | 1,022,208x slower |