
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.20 T | SHA-256 @ 843 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 8m | - | |
| $12.42 B | Scrypt @ 2.40 PH/s | 503 MW | 1,491 confs | 1d 1h | 23x slower | |
| $6.75 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 44 MW | 14,007 confs | 12d 3h | 257x slower | |
| $5.88 B | RandomX @ 5.03 GH/s | 31 MW | 11,577 confs | 17d 24m | 359x slower | |
| $4.00 B | SHA-256 @ 2.17 EH/s | 29 MW | 1,808 confs | 18d 9h | 389x slower | |
| $3.32 B | Scrypt @ 2.48 PH/s | 521 MW | 569 confs | 1d 48m | 22x slower | |
| $1.12 B | Etchash @ 189 TH/s | 388 MW | 8,863 confs | 1d 9h | 29x slower | |
| $418.53 M | X11 @ 2.51 PH/s | 4.03 MW | 73,676 confs | 133d 21h | 2,827x slower | |
| $69.85 M | RandomX @ 65 MH/s | 414 KW | 1,871,084 confs | 3y 204d | 27,435x slower | |
| $63.07 M | KawPow @ 1.67 TH/s | 8.20 MW | 94,627 confs | 65d 17h | 1,387x slower | |
| $44.92 M | Eaglesong @ 73 PH/s | 3.58 MW | 1,461,729 confs | 150d 10h | 3,177x slower | |
| $83,653 | RandomX @ 1.38 MH/s | 8.69 KW | 6,369,782 confs | 169y 317d | 1,309,136x slower | |
| $57,044 | KawPow @ 747 MH/s | 3.68 KW | 421,773,720 confs | 401y 84d | 3,092,183x slower |