
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.52 T | SHA-256 @ 878 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 6m | - | |
| $14.65 B | Scrypt @ 2.82 PH/s | 592 MW | 1,265 confs | 22h 8m | 20x slower | |
| $8.89 B | SHA-256 @ 6.72 EH/s | 90 MW | 964 confs | 6d 36m | 131x slower | |
| $6.53 B | RandomX @ 5.42 GH/s | 34 MW | 11,713 confs | 15d 23h | 347x slower | |
| $5.22 B | Equihash @ 15 GH/s | 50 MW | 12,716 confs | 10d 21h | 237x slower | |
| $4.24 B | Scrypt @ 2.76 PH/s | 579 MW | 558 confs | 22h 37m | 20x slower | |
| $1.32 B | Etchash @ 190 TH/s | 390 MW | 8,840 confs | 1d 9h | 30x slower | |
| $433.19 M | X11 @ 4.35 PH/s | 6.98 MW | 43,352 confs | 78d 6h | 1,700x slower | |
| $108.75 M | RandomX @ 95 MH/s | 603 KW | 1,302,016 confs | 2y 174d | 19,638x slower | |
| $97.28 M | KawPow @ 2.68 TH/s | 13 MW | 59,637 confs | 41d 9h | 899x slower | |
| $73.27 M | Eaglesong @ 135 PH/s | 6.59 MW | 608,527 confs | 82d 21h | 1,800x slower | |
| $269,849 | RandomX @ 452 KH/s | 2.85 KW | 1,717,917 confs | 525y 169d | 4,165,667x slower | |
| $73,721 | KawPow @ 996 MH/s | 4.91 KW | 320,253,845 confs | 304y 239d | 2,415,187x slower |