
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.34 T | SHA-256 @ 956 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 6s | - | |
| $14.10 B | Scrypt @ 3.99 PH/s | 838 MW | 882 confs | 15h 26m | 15x slower | |
| $9.10 B | SHA-256 @ 5.61 EH/s | 75 MW | 870 confs | 7d 2h | 170x slower | |
| $6.03 B | RandomX @ 5.98 GH/s | 37 MW | 10,480 confs | 14d 7h | 343x slower | |
| $4.15 B | Scrypt @ 2.82 PH/s | 592 MW | 524 confs | 21h 50m | 22x slower | |
| $3.71 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 46 MW | 13,532 confs | 11d 14h | 278x slower | |
| $1.26 B | Etchash @ 210 TH/s | 430 MW | 8,055 confs | 1d 6h | 30x slower | |
| $407.99 M | X11 @ 2.88 PH/s | 4.63 MW | 64,509 confs | 116d 11h | 2,791x slower | |
| $94.91 M | KawPow @ 3.84 TH/s | 18 MW | 41,672 confs | 28d 10h | 682x slower | |
| $87.44 M | RandomX @ 80 MH/s | 505 KW | 1,533,453 confs | 2y 334d | 25,515x slower | |
| $65.50 M | Eaglesong @ 163 PH/s | 7.91 MW | 555,325 confs | 68d 3h | 1,632x slower | |
| $255,382 | RandomX @ 2.30 MH/s | 14 KW | 1,193,796 confs | 101y 344d | 891,540x slower | |
| $95,391 | KawPow @ 2.50 GH/s | 12 KW | 126,003,149 confs | 119y 316d | 1,048,279x slower |