
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.33 T | SHA-256 @ 1,018 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 56m 24s | - | |
| $13.85 B | Scrypt @ 4.33 PH/s | 909 MW | 813 confs | 14h 13m | 15x slower | |
| $9.46 B | SHA-256 @ 7.99 EH/s | 107 MW | 855 confs | 4d 23h | 128x slower | |
| $6.05 B | RandomX @ 5.34 GH/s | 33 MW | 10,903 confs | 16d 38m | 409x slower | |
| $4.14 B | Scrypt @ 2.70 PH/s | 566 MW | 556 confs | 22h 51m | 24x slower | |
| $3.58 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 42 MW | 14,474 confs | 12d 13h | 321x slower | |
| $1.26 B | Etchash @ 194 TH/s | 398 MW | 8,665 confs | 1d 8h | 35x slower | |
| $399.73 M | X11 @ 2.67 PH/s | 4.28 MW | 69,292 confs | 125d 21h | 3,215x slower | |
| $94.57 M | RandomX @ 82 MH/s | 519 KW | 1,494,474 confs | 2y 307d | 26,498x slower | |
| $88.46 M | KawPow @ 3.67 TH/s | 18 MW | 43,601 confs | 29d 18h | 760x slower | |
| $66.45 M | Eaglesong @ 112 PH/s | 5.45 MW | 773,971 confs | 98d 20h | 2,523x slower | |
| $261,265 | RandomX @ 1.46 MH/s | 9.18 KW | 4,517,324 confs | 160y 262d | 1,497,765x slower | |
| $103,834 | KawPow @ 2.49 GH/s | 12 KW | 130,875,220 confs | 120y 128d | 1,121,567x slower |