
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.59 T | SHA-256 @ 928 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 1m | - | |
| $17.72 B | Scrypt @ 3.93 PH/s | 825 MW | 901 confs | 15h 31m | 15x slower | |
| $8.82 B | Equihash @ 16 GH/s | 54 MW | 11,415 confs | 9d 18h | 230x slower | |
| $8.72 B | SHA-256 @ 5.48 EH/s | 74 MW | 1,063 confs | 7d 5h | 169x slower | |
| $7.32 B | RandomX @ 6.08 GH/s | 38 MW | 10,375 confs | 13d 22h | 327x slower | |
| $4.41 B | Scrypt @ 2.87 PH/s | 603 MW | 497 confs | 21h 15m | 21x slower | |
| $1.46 B | Etchash @ 189 TH/s | 388 MW | 8,740 confs | 1d 8h | 32x slower | |
| $561.05 M | X11 @ 12 PH/s | 19 MW | 55,456 confs | 27d 14h | 648x slower | |
| $96.51 M | KawPow @ 1.87 TH/s | 9.23 MW | 83,259 confs | 57d 19h | 1,358x slower | |
| $81.73 M | RandomX @ 66 MH/s | 421 KW | 1,763,481 confs | 3y 170d | 29,727x slower | |
| $78.01 M | Eaglesong @ 149 PH/s | 7.24 MW | 668,981 confs | 73d 15h | 1,730x slower | |
| $233,365 | RandomX @ 742 KH/s | 4.68 KW | 1,678,350 confs | 312y 166d | 2,679,062x slower | |
| $67,180 | KawPow @ 780 MH/s | 3.84 KW | 399,641,787 confs | 380y 64d | 3,259,721x slower |