
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.23 T | SHA-256 @ 881 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 5m | - | |
| $12.64 B | Scrypt @ 2.85 PH/s | 599 MW | 1,254 confs | 21h 35m | 20x slower | |
| $7.23 B | Equihash @ 16 GH/s | 55 MW | 11,095 confs | 9d 15h | 213x slower | |
| $5.94 B | RandomX @ 5.19 GH/s | 32 MW | 11,868 confs | 16d 11h | 364x slower | |
| $4.41 B | SHA-256 @ 4.05 EH/s | 54 MW | 1,661 confs | 9d 20h | 218x slower | |
| $3.36 B | Scrypt @ 2.58 PH/s | 541 MW | 594 confs | 23h 55m | 22x slower | |
| $1.11 B | Etchash @ 175 TH/s | 359 MW | 9,489 confs | 1d 12h | 33x slower | |
| $443.22 M | X11 @ 3.12 PH/s | 5.01 MW | 60,021 confs | 107d 16h | 2,378x slower | |
| $70.21 M | RandomX @ 70 MH/s | 441 KW | 1,787,267 confs | 3y 125d | 26,955x slower | |
| $62.51 M | KawPow @ 1.46 TH/s | 7.21 MW | 107,585 confs | 74d 17h | 1,650x slower | |
| $45.43 M | Eaglesong @ 77 PH/s | 3.77 MW | 1,433,992 confs | 142d 23h | 3,158x slower | |
| $79,649 | RandomX @ 373 KH/s | 2.35 KW | 6,468,888 confs | 628y 185d | 5,066,633x slower | |
| $56,058 | KawPow @ 947 MH/s | 4.67 KW | 332,620,747 confs | 316y 153d | 2,550,773x slower |