
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.50 T | SHA-256 @ 1,062 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 56m 12s | - | |
| $15.23 B | Scrypt @ 1.66 PH/s | 347 MW | 2,207 confs | 1d 14h | 41x slower | |
| $9.14 B | SHA-256 @ 5.85 EH/s | 78 MW | 1,016 confs | 7d 2h | 182x slower | |
| $6.34 B | RandomX @ 5.39 GH/s | 33 MW | 11,981 confs | 16d 12h | 423x slower | |
| $5.67 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 44 MW | 14,321 confs | 12d 14h | 323x slower | |
| $4.33 B | Scrypt @ 2.64 PH/s | 554 MW | 559 confs | 1d 13m | 26x slower | |
| $1.36 B | Etchash @ 188 TH/s | 386 MW | 9,190 confs | 1d 10h | 37x slower | |
| $467.16 M | X11 @ 2.43 PH/s | 3.90 MW | 77,876 confs | 143d 7h | 3,672x slower | |
| $113.12 M | RandomX @ 96 MH/s | 606 KW | 1,329,028 confs | 2y 192d | 23,648x slower | |
| $96.44 M | KawPow @ 3.04 TH/s | 14 MW | 53,765 confs | 37d 8h | 957x slower | |
| $76.68 M | Eaglesong @ 139 PH/s | 6.76 MW | 695,535 confs | 82d 19h | 2,122x slower | |
| $276,268 | RandomX @ 788 KH/s | 4.97 KW | 1,760,638 confs | 308y 228d | 2,886,360x slower | |
| $54,403 | KawPow @ 1.20 GH/s | 5.90 KW | 282,519,112 confs | 259y 292d | 2,429,731x slower |