
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.57 T | SHA-256 @ 891 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 5m | - | |
| $16.31 B | Scrypt @ 2.60 PH/s | 545 MW | 1,372 confs | 1d 36s | 22x slower | |
| $9.20 B | SHA-256 @ 5.32 EH/s | 71 MW | 1,027 confs | 7d 14h | 167x slower | |
| $6.80 B | RandomX @ 6.16 GH/s | 38 MW | 10,760 confs | 14d 1h | 310x slower | |
| $5.24 B | Equihash @ 15 GH/s | 52 MW | 12,091 confs | 10d 11h | 231x slower | |
| $4.28 B | Scrypt @ 2.53 PH/s | 531 MW | 569 confs | 1d 39m | 23x slower | |
| $1.32 B | Etchash @ 179 TH/s | 367 MW | 9,294 confs | 1d 11h | 33x slower | |
| $446.57 M | X11 @ 3.42 PH/s | 5.49 MW | 54,733 confs | 99d 10h | 2,193x slower | |
| $107.81 M | RandomX @ 79 MH/s | 499 KW | 1,575,153 confs | 2y 363d | 24,122x slower | |
| $96.18 M | KawPow @ 2.49 TH/s | 12 MW | 63,980 confs | 44d 10h | 980x slower | |
| $72.17 M | Eaglesong @ 149 PH/s | 7.24 MW | 694,441 confs | 75d 8h | 1,662x slower | |
| $269,417 | RandomX @ 939 KH/s | 5.91 KW | 1,717,916 confs | 252y 338d | 2,035,805x slower | |
| $77,451 | KawPow @ 1.49 GH/s | 7.35 KW | 213,859,442 confs | 203y 161d | 1,637,515x slower |