
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.51 T | SHA-256 @ 1,038 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 56m 6s | - | |
| $14.58 B | Scrypt @ 4.61 PH/s | 967 MW | 775 confs | 13h 33m | 14x slower | |
| $8.90 B | SHA-256 @ 6.02 EH/s | 81 MW | 972 confs | 6d 17h | 172x slower | |
| $6.47 B | RandomX @ 5.39 GH/s | 33 MW | 11,980 confs | 16d 2h | 413x slower | |
| $5.39 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 49 MW | 12,829 confs | 11d 3h | 286x slower | |
| $4.28 B | Scrypt @ 2.84 PH/s | 596 MW | 545 confs | 21h 57m | 23x slower | |
| $1.32 B | Etchash @ 204 TH/s | 417 MW | 8,371 confs | 1d 7h | 34x slower | |
| $435.04 M | X11 @ 3.40 PH/s | 5.45 MW | 55,529 confs | 100d 6h | 2,574x slower | |
| $119.34 M | RandomX @ 91 MH/s | 574 KW | 1,346,827 confs | 2y 220d | 24,408x slower | |
| $94.59 M | KawPow @ 2.67 TH/s | 13 MW | 59,854 confs | 41d 13h | 1,067x slower | |
| $76.80 M | Eaglesong @ 150 PH/s | 7.28 MW | 557,452 confs | 74d 23h | 1,925x slower | |
| $245,029 | RandomX @ 831 KH/s | 5.24 KW | 1,717,915 confs | 285y 223d | 2,675,885x slower | |
| $58,595 | KawPow @ 926 MH/s | 4.56 KW | 344,576,200 confs | 327y 289d | 3,071,089x slower |