
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.51 T | SHA-256 @ 891 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 9m | - | |
| $15.84 B | Scrypt @ 2.82 PH/s | 592 MW | 1,351 confs | 23h 38m | 20x slower | |
| $9.59 B | SHA-256 @ 5.57 EH/s | 75 MW | 968 confs | 7d 18h | 160x slower | |
| $6.85 B | RandomX @ 6.20 GH/s | 39 MW | 11,057 confs | 14d 23h | 308x slower | |
| $4.57 B | Equihash @ 16 GH/s | 53 MW | 12,793 confs | 10d 22h | 226x slower | |
| $4.52 B | Scrypt @ 2.81 PH/s | 589 MW | 564 confs | 23h 48m | 20x slower | |
| $1.41 B | Etchash @ 200 TH/s | 410 MW | 9,152 confs | 1d 10h | 29x slower | |
| $454.73 M | X11 @ 3.21 PH/s | 5.14 MW | 62,094 confs | 113d 13h | 2,339x slower | |
| $120.14 M | RandomX @ 114 MH/s | 723 KW | 1,202,695 confs | 2y 77d | 16,632x slower | |
| $111.14 M | KawPow @ 3.43 TH/s | 16 MW | 49,745 confs | 34d 13h | 712x slower | |
| $78.27 M | Eaglesong @ 109 PH/s | 5.29 MW | 820,454 confs | 110d 8h | 2,273x slower | |
| $355,093 | RandomX @ 4.78 MH/s | 30 KW | 1,867,878 confs | 53y 47d | 399,496x slower | |
| $90,550 | KawPow @ 2.04 GH/s | 10 KW | 167,805,161 confs | 159y 230d | 1,200,323x slower |