
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.59 T | SHA-256 @ 974 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 1h 12s | - | |
| $19.21 B | Scrypt @ 3.55 PH/s | 746 MW | 1,011 confs | 17h 41m | 18x slower | |
| $8.63 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 40 MW | 15,748 confs | 13d 16h | 327x slower | |
| $8.55 B | SHA-256 @ 5.68 EH/s | 76 MW | 1,106 confs | 7d 4h | 172x slower | |
| $7.04 B | RandomX @ 5.78 GH/s | 36 MW | 10,787 confs | 15d 2h | 361x slower | |
| $4.42 B | Scrypt @ 2.71 PH/s | 569 MW | 512 confs | 23h 10m | 23x slower | |
| $1.45 B | Etchash @ 192 TH/s | 393 MW | 8,980 confs | 1d 9h | 33x slower | |
| $552.35 M | X11 @ 3.04 PH/s | 4.87 MW | 62,567 confs | 112d 23h | 2,702x slower | |
| $94.37 M | RandomX @ 74 MH/s | 466 KW | 1,756,979 confs | 3y 84d | 28,213x slower | |
| $92.59 M | KawPow @ 2.49 TH/s | 12 MW | 65,600 confs | 44d 19h | 1,072x slower | |
| $74.38 M | Eaglesong @ 134 PH/s | 6.54 MW | 751,988 confs | 84d 1h | 2,011x slower | |
| $211,760 | RandomX @ 664 KH/s | 4.18 KW | 6,922,954 confs | 360y 88d | 3,145,229x slower | |
| $67,756 | KawPow @ 1.12 GH/s | 5.50 KW | 287,978,177 confs | 273y 347d | 2,391,845x slower |