
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.34 T | SHA-256 @ 909 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 5m | - | |
| $14.04 B | Scrypt @ 3.02 PH/s | 633 MW | 1,211 confs | 21h 11m | 19x slower | |
| $8.88 B | SHA-256 @ 6.62 EH/s | 89 MW | 923 confs | 6d 6h | 137x slower | |
| $5.82 B | RandomX @ 5.44 GH/s | 34 MW | 11,378 confs | 16d 7h | 358x slower | |
| $4.09 B | Scrypt @ 2.80 PH/s | 587 MW | 560 confs | 22h 52m | 21x slower | |
| $3.91 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 46 MW | 14,051 confs | 12d 49m | 264x slower | |
| $1.26 B | Etchash @ 194 TH/s | 398 MW | 8,973 confs | 1d 9h | 31x slower | |
| $378.52 M | X11 @ 1.76 PH/s | 2.82 MW | 108,511 confs | 198d 10h | 4,356x slower | |
| $137.16 M | RandomX @ 149 MH/s | 943 KW | 899,256 confs | 1y 228d | 13,023x slower | |
| $91.68 M | KawPow @ 3.03 TH/s | 14 MW | 53,937 confs | 37d 10h | 822x slower | |
| $71.41 M | Eaglesong @ 138 PH/s | 6.70 MW | 620,154 confs | 83d 11h | 1,832x slower | |
| $273,490 | RandomX @ 1.99 MH/s | 12 KW | 1,304,192 confs | 122y 226d | 982,451x slower | |
| $93,421 | KawPow @ 2.05 GH/s | 10 KW | 159,839,616 confs | 152y 19d | 1,218,290x slower |