
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.55 T | SHA-256 @ 1,121 EH/s | 15 GW | 6 confs | 52m 18s | - | |
| $15.72 B | Scrypt @ 4.13 PH/s | 868 MW | 856 confs | 15h 13m | 17x slower | |
| $10.83 B | Equihash @ 10 GH/s | 33 MW | 18,542 confs | 16d 7h | 449x slower | |
| $7.11 B | RandomX @ 7.50 GH/s | 47 MW | 8,907 confs | 11d 15h | 321x slower | |
| $7.03 B | SHA-256 @ 4.45 EH/s | 60 MW | 1,224 confs | 9d 3h | 252x slower | |
| $4.06 B | Scrypt @ 3.02 PH/s | 633 MW | 511 confs | 20h 51m | 24x slower | |
| $1.40 B | Etchash @ 190 TH/s | 390 MW | 8,972 confs | 1d 9h | 39x slower | |
| $565.38 M | X11 @ 2.38 PH/s | 3.82 MW | 79,721 confs | 143d 22h | 3,963x slower | |
| $88.26 M | KawPow @ 2.76 TH/s | 13 MW | 59,189 confs | 40d 10h | 1,113x slower | |
| $84.73 M | RandomX @ 81 MH/s | 512 KW | 1,626,983 confs | 2y 343d | 29,553x slower | |
| $68.12 M | Eaglesong @ 88 PH/s | 4.30 MW | 1,023,686 confs | 128d 1m | 3,524x slower | |
| $216,755 | RandomX @ 529 KH/s | 3.33 KW | 1,885,517 confs | 452y 2d | 4,542,545x slower | |
| $45,692 | KawPow @ 660 MH/s | 3.25 KW | 503,501,133 confs | 463y 4d | 4,653,133x slower |