
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.21 T | SHA-256 @ 1,118 EH/s | 15 GW | 6 confs | 51m 24s | - | |
| $12.72 B | Scrypt @ 3.01 PH/s | 632 MW | 1,169 confs | 20h 27m | 24x slower | |
| $6.68 B | Equihash @ 18 GH/s | 62 MW | 9,986 confs | 8d 16h | 243x slower | |
| $5.89 B | RandomX @ 6.34 GH/s | 39 MW | 10,232 confs | 13d 12h | 378x slower | |
| $3.94 B | SHA-256 @ 4.06 EH/s | 54 MW | 1,685 confs | 9d 19h | 275x slower | |
| $3.26 B | Scrypt @ 2.72 PH/s | 572 MW | 543 confs | 22h 37m | 26x slower | |
| $1.11 B | Etchash @ 183 TH/s | 374 MW | 9,153 confs | 1d 10h | 40x slower | |
| $421.80 M | X11 @ 2.65 PH/s | 4.26 MW | 69,660 confs | 126d 13h | 3,546x slower | |
| $73.40 M | RandomX @ 74 MH/s | 467 KW | 1,687,509 confs | 3y 57d | 32,284x slower | |
| $65.10 M | KawPow @ 1.53 TH/s | 7.55 MW | 102,857 confs | 71d 10h | 2,001x slower | |
| $46.19 M | Eaglesong @ 82 PH/s | 3.98 MW | 1,194,810 confs | 135d 6h | 3,790x slower | |
| $109,169 | RandomX @ 2.21 MH/s | 13 KW | 5,870,766 confs | 105y 337d | 1,083,160x slower | |
| $58,957 | KawPow @ 673 MH/s | 3.32 KW | 467,692,634 confs | 444y 333d | 4,549,539x slower |