
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.34 T | SHA-256 @ 780 EH/s | 10 GW | 6 confs | 1h 16m | - | |
| $14.43 B | Scrypt @ 2.33 PH/s | 489 MW | 1,568 confs | 1d 3h | 22x slower | |
| $10.62 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 47 MW | 13,311 confs | 11d 17h | 220x slower | |
| $6.18 B | RandomX @ 5.69 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,349 confs | 15d 15h | 294x slower | |
| $5.42 B | SHA-256 @ 4.03 EH/s | 54 MW | 1,444 confs | 10d 6h | 193x slower | |
| $3.66 B | Scrypt @ 3.08 PH/s | 645 MW | 524 confs | 20h 48m | 16x slower | |
| $1.21 B | Etchash @ 187 TH/s | 384 MW | 9,302 confs | 1d 10h | 27x slower | |
| $496.26 M | X11 @ 3.80 PH/s | 6.09 MW | 51,212 confs | 91d 20h | 1,729x slower | |
| $89.27 M | RandomX @ 68 MH/s | 430 KW | 1,841,221 confs | 3y 204d | 24,469x slower | |
| $78.80 M | KawPow @ 2.41 TH/s | 11 MW | 68,002 confs | 47d 5h | 889x slower | |
| $58.75 M | Eaglesong @ 102 PH/s | 4.98 MW | 977,362 confs | 112d 10h | 2,116x slower | |
| $197,759 | RandomX @ 5.27 MH/s | 33 KW | 2,971,227 confs | 46y 60d | 317,190x slower | |
| $54,668 | KawPow @ 992 MH/s | 4.89 KW | 329,793,689 confs | 313y 266d | 2,155,514x slower |