
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.49 T | SHA-256 @ 1,023 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 58m 18s | - | |
| $15.85 B | Scrypt @ 1.73 PH/s | 363 MW | 2,110 confs | 1d 12h | 38x slower | |
| $8.73 B | SHA-256 @ 5.38 EH/s | 72 MW | 999 confs | 7d 17h | 190x slower | |
| $6.38 B | RandomX @ 5.52 GH/s | 34 MW | 11,692 confs | 16d 2h | 398x slower | |
| $6.05 B | Equihash @ 16 GH/s | 55 MW | 11,814 confs | 10d 2h | 250x slower | |
| $4.19 B | Scrypt @ 2.72 PH/s | 570 MW | 554 confs | 23h 32m | 24x slower | |
| $1.34 B | Etchash @ 213 TH/s | 437 MW | 8,327 confs | 1d 6h | 32x slower | |
| $518.98 M | X11 @ 2.93 PH/s | 4.70 MW | 65,485 confs | 118d 23h | 2,939x slower | |
| $113.32 M | RandomX @ 97 MH/s | 612 KW | 1,293,352 confs | 2y 183d | 22,554x slower | |
| $93.21 M | KawPow @ 2.35 TH/s | 11 MW | 69,554 confs | 48d 7h | 1,193x slower | |
| $73.35 M | Eaglesong @ 107 PH/s | 5.20 MW | 917,426 confs | 107d 16h | 2,660x slower | |
| $232,636 | RandomX @ 827 KH/s | 5.21 KW | 1,304,192 confs | 294y 29d | 2,651,260x slower | |
| $88,711 | KawPow @ 1.97 GH/s | 9.72 KW | 165,822,440 confs | 157y 272d | 1,422,148x slower |