
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.57 T | SHA-256 @ 828 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 10m | - | |
| $15.00 B | Scrypt @ 3.45 PH/s | 725 MW | 1,033 confs | 18h 4m | 15x slower | |
| $9.23 B | SHA-256 @ 6.48 EH/s | 87 MW | 991 confs | 6d 6h | 128x slower | |
| $7.00 B | RandomX @ 5.17 GH/s | 32 MW | 11,584 confs | 16d 18h | 343x slower | |
| $5.68 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 39 MW | 15,948 confs | 13d 15h | 280x slower | |
| $4.33 B | Scrypt @ 2.57 PH/s | 538 MW | 569 confs | 1d 20m | 21x slower | |
| $1.33 B | Etchash @ 203 TH/s | 415 MW | 8,517 confs | 1d 7h | 27x slower | |
| $466.00 M | X11 @ 2.34 PH/s | 3.75 MW | 79,615 confs | 145d 14h | 2,982x slower | |
| $108.22 M | RandomX @ 82 MH/s | 516 KW | 1,548,058 confs | 2y 327d | 21,654x slower | |
| $95.33 M | KawPow @ 2.74 TH/s | 13 MW | 59,213 confs | 40d 10h | 828x slower | |
| $73.64 M | Eaglesong @ 132 PH/s | 6.43 MW | 673,897 confs | 84d 21h | 1,739x slower | |
| $244,654 | RandomX @ 8.37 MH/s | 52 KW | 1,717,915 confs | 28y 139d | 212,194x slower | |
| $77,266 | KawPow @ 1.38 GH/s | 6.81 KW | 230,860,275 confs | 219y 224d | 1,641,965x slower |