
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.62 T | SHA-256 @ 903 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 3m | - | |
| $17.00 B | Scrypt @ 2.79 PH/s | 586 MW | 1,248 confs | 21h 50m | 21x slower | |
| $9.64 B | Equihash @ 11 GH/s | 38 MW | 15,614 confs | 13d 17h | 314x slower | |
| $8.81 B | SHA-256 @ 5.54 EH/s | 74 MW | 1,073 confs | 7d 3h | 163x slower | |
| $7.60 B | RandomX @ 5.15 GH/s | 32 MW | 11,115 confs | 16d 11h | 376x slower | |
| $4.47 B | Scrypt @ 2.91 PH/s | 610 MW | 507 confs | 20h 59m | 20x slower | |
| $1.47 B | Etchash @ 198 TH/s | 407 MW | 8,438 confs | 1d 7h | 30x slower | |
| $595.37 M | X11 @ 57 TH/s | 92 KW | 69,659 confs | 15y 296d | 131,927x slower | |
| $99.56 M | KawPow @ 2.25 TH/s | 11 MW | 70,628 confs | 48d 5h | 1,102x slower | |
| $81.76 M | Eaglesong @ 122 PH/s | 5.94 MW | 709,909 confs | 89d 18h | 2,051x slower | |
| $80.24 M | RandomX @ 83 MH/s | 525 KW | 1,510,982 confs | 2y 284d | 23,184x slower | |
| $239,600 | RandomX @ 354 KH/s | 2.23 KW | 1,678,351 confs | 655y 206d | 5,469,292x slower | |
| $71,058 | KawPow @ 818 MH/s | 4.03 KW | 368,883,040 confs | 362y 223d | 3,025,231x slower |