
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.55 T | SHA-256 @ 970 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 1h | - | |
| $16.86 B | Scrypt @ 2.81 PH/s | 589 MW | 1,271 confs | 22h 14m | 22x slower | |
| $9.08 B | SHA-256 @ 6.74 EH/s | 90 MW | 961 confs | 6d 9m | 144x slower | |
| $6.42 B | RandomX @ 5.19 GH/s | 32 MW | 11,467 confs | 16d 17h | 401x slower | |
| $5.55 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 48 MW | 13,100 confs | 11d 8h | 273x slower | |
| $4.35 B | Scrypt @ 2.66 PH/s | 558 MW | 545 confs | 23h 27m | 23x slower | |
| $1.37 B | Etchash @ 210 TH/s | 430 MW | 8,209 confs | 1d 6h | 30x slower | |
| $468.07 M | X11 @ 3.47 PH/s | 5.56 MW | 54,698 confs | 98d 3h | 2,355x slower | |
| $113.55 M | RandomX @ 100 MH/s | 629 KW | 1,269,567 confs | 2y 136d | 20,807x slower | |
| $99.26 M | KawPow @ 2.62 TH/s | 12 MW | 60,945 confs | 42d 7h | 1,016x slower | |
| $78.97 M | Eaglesong @ 97 PH/s | 4.71 MW | 930,770 confs | 115d 19h | 2,780x slower | |
| $268,166 | RandomX @ 732 KH/s | 4.61 KW | 1,717,917 confs | 324y 184d | 2,842,674x slower | |
| $54,406 | KawPow @ 1.07 GH/s | 5.28 KW | 298,052,424 confs | 283y 195d | 2,483,770x slower |