
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.57 T | SHA-256 @ 995 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 58m 30s | - | |
| $16.80 B | Scrypt @ 2.34 PH/s | 492 MW | 1,546 confs | 1d 2h | 27x slower | |
| $9.08 B | SHA-256 @ 6.39 EH/s | 86 MW | 991 confs | 6d 7h | 156x slower | |
| $7.23 B | RandomX @ 5.38 GH/s | 33 MW | 11,509 confs | 16d 2h | 397x slower | |
| $5.95 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 44 MW | 14,185 confs | 12d 3h | 299x slower | |
| $4.33 B | Scrypt @ 2.48 PH/s | 521 MW | 607 confs | 1d 1h | 26x slower | |
| $1.33 B | Etchash @ 203 TH/s | 416 MW | 8,416 confs | 1d 7h | 32x slower | |
| $460.27 M | X11 @ 2.76 PH/s | 4.42 MW | 67,495 confs | 123d 10h | 3,038x slower | |
| $103.72 M | RandomX @ 89 MH/s | 564 KW | 1,415,656 confs | 2y 236d | 23,796x slower | |
| $96.86 M | KawPow @ 2.34 TH/s | 11 MW | 68,130 confs | 47d 7h | 1,165x slower | |
| $77.56 M | Eaglesong @ 103 PH/s | 5.00 MW | 891,858 confs | 109d 2h | 2,686x slower | |
| $249,256 | RandomX @ 1.02 MH/s | 6.41 KW | 1,717,915 confs | 233y 174d | 2,097,715x slower | |
| $54,440 | KawPow @ 944 MH/s | 4.65 KW | 337,978,138 confs | 321y 188d | 2,888,702x slower |