
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.32 T | SHA-256 @ 1,002 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 53m 30s | - | |
| $14.89 B | Scrypt @ 2.63 PH/s | 552 MW | 1,249 confs | 21h 51m | 25x slower | |
| $8.43 B | Equihash @ 17 GH/s | 57 MW | 10,126 confs | 8d 18h | 237x slower | |
| $6.43 B | RandomX @ 5.82 GH/s | 36 MW | 10,051 confs | 13d 17h | 369x slower | |
| $4.31 B | SHA-256 @ 3.29 EH/s | 44 MW | 1,597 confs | 11d 7h | 304x slower | |
| $3.54 B | Scrypt @ 2.54 PH/s | 532 MW | 495 confs | 22h 41m | 25x slower | |
| $1.17 B | Etchash @ 187 TH/s | 383 MW | 8,360 confs | 1d 7h | 35x slower | |
| $481.86 M | X11 @ 2.41 PH/s | 3.86 MW | 72,150 confs | 130d 6h | 3,506x slower | |
| $78.03 M | RandomX @ 69 MH/s | 435 KW | 1,661,604 confs | 3y 58d | 31,058x slower | |
| $72.00 M | KawPow @ 1.70 TH/s | 8.36 MW | 86,690 confs | 60d 4h | 1,620x slower | |
| $56.46 M | Eaglesong @ 125 PH/s | 6.10 MW | 718,034 confs | 82d 12h | 2,221x slower | |
| $118,078 | RandomX @ 4.23 MH/s | 26 KW | 3,583,870 confs | 51y 258d | 507,994x slower | |
| $60,940 | KawPow @ 770 MH/s | 3.79 KW | 381,797,843 confs | 363y 73d | 3,568,204x slower |