
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.33 T | SHA-256 @ 1,160 EH/s | 15 GW | 6 confs | 49m 30s | - | |
| $15.38 B | Scrypt @ 4.66 PH/s | 979 MW | 755 confs | 13h 12m | 16x slower | |
| $9.63 B | SHA-256 @ 7.46 EH/s | 100 MW | 830 confs | 5d 8h | 156x slower | |
| $6.07 B | RandomX @ 6.39 GH/s | 40 MW | 10,145 confs | 13d 9h | 389x slower | |
| $4.15 B | Scrypt @ 2.96 PH/s | 620 MW | 556 confs | 20h 51m | 25x slower | |
| $3.54 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 40 MW | 15,377 confs | 13d 8h | 388x slower | |
| $1.25 B | Etchash @ 206 TH/s | 422 MW | 8,229 confs | 1d 6h | 37x slower | |
| $400.51 M | X11 @ 2.28 PH/s | 3.65 MW | 80,158 confs | 147d 12h | 4,291x slower | |
| $92.29 M | KawPow @ 2.95 TH/s | 14 MW | 52,462 confs | 37d 56m | 1,077x slower | |
| $90.34 M | RandomX @ 84 MH/s | 528 KW | 1,466,482 confs | 2y 288d | 29,626x slower | |
| $66.32 M | Eaglesong @ 90 PH/s | 4.41 MW | 1,056,672 confs | 122d 6h | 3,557x slower | |
| $233,672 | RandomX @ 11 MH/s | 71 KW | 1,193,796 confs | 20y 257d | 219,867x slower | |
| $98,556 | KawPow @ 2.31 GH/s | 11 KW | 136,397,005 confs | 129y 275d | 1,377,748x slower |