
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.17 T | SHA-256 @ 1,017 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 56m 30s | - | |
| $12.27 B | Scrypt @ 1.97 PH/s | 414 MW | 1,813 confs | 1d 7h | 33x slower | |
| $6.65 B | Equihash @ 22 GH/s | 73 MW | 8,555 confs | 7d 7h | 187x slower | |
| $5.70 B | RandomX @ 5.73 GH/s | 36 MW | 11,133 confs | 14d 22h | 381x slower | |
| $4.02 B | SHA-256 @ 3.72 EH/s | 50 MW | 1,733 confs | 10d 17h | 273x slower | |
| $3.24 B | Scrypt @ 2.50 PH/s | 525 MW | 569 confs | 1d 39m | 26x slower | |
| $1.08 B | Etchash @ 188 TH/s | 385 MW | 8,930 confs | 1d 9h | 36x slower | |
| $414.48 M | X11 @ 2.20 PH/s | 3.53 MW | 83,460 confs | 152d 14h | 3,890x slower | |
| $68.30 M | RandomX @ 67 MH/s | 425 KW | 1,853,410 confs | 3y 170d | 32,257x slower | |
| $60.13 M | KawPow @ 1.44 TH/s | 7.10 MW | 107,459 confs | 75d 20h | 1,934x slower | |
| $42.48 M | Eaglesong @ 71 PH/s | 3.46 MW | 1,587,794 confs | 155d 14h | 3,965x slower | |
| $98,692 | RandomX @ 1.46 MH/s | 9.19 KW | 9,147,006 confs | 160y 250d | 1,494,820x slower | |
| $56,854 | KawPow @ 710 MH/s | 3.50 KW | 443,705,426 confs | 422y 34d | 3,926,597x slower |