
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.52 T | SHA-256 @ 865 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 7m | - | |
| $17.93 B | Scrypt @ 3.69 PH/s | 774 MW | 967 confs | 16h 55m | 15x slower | |
| $8.97 B | SHA-256 @ 5.94 EH/s | 80 MW | 998 confs | 6d 19h | 146x slower | |
| $6.95 B | RandomX @ 5.60 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,440 confs | 15d 11h | 331x slower | |
| $5.43 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 47 MW | 13,395 confs | 11d 11h | 245x slower | |
| $4.27 B | Scrypt @ 2.96 PH/s | 622 MW | 558 confs | 21h 4m | 19x slower | |
| $1.31 B | Etchash @ 195 TH/s | 399 MW | 8,692 confs | 1d 8h | 29x slower | |
| $437.39 M | X11 @ 2.85 PH/s | 4.57 MW | 65,719 confs | 119d 10h | 2,555x slower | |
| $96.29 M | RandomX @ 83 MH/s | 523 KW | 1,525,858 confs | 2y 311d | 22,295x slower | |
| $94.41 M | KawPow @ 2.38 TH/s | 11 MW | 67,165 confs | 46d 15h | 998x slower | |
| $72.72 M | Eaglesong @ 108 PH/s | 5.25 MW | 749,395 confs | 104d 49m | 2,226x slower | |
| $248,448 | RandomX @ 1.21 MH/s | 7.61 KW | 1,717,915 confs | 196y 238d | 1,535,827x slower | |
| $46,074 | KawPow @ 551 MH/s | 2.71 KW | 579,323,989 confs | 551y 39d | 4,304,042x slower |