
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.29 T | SHA-256 @ 781 EH/s | 10 GW | 6 confs | 1h 8m | - | |
| $14.96 B | Scrypt @ 2.15 PH/s | 450 MW | 1,531 confs | 1d 2h | 23x slower | |
| $7.07 B | Equihash @ 17 GH/s | 59 MW | 9,741 confs | 8d 10h | 177x slower | |
| $6.32 B | RandomX @ 5.89 GH/s | 37 MW | 10,288 confs | 13d 13h | 285x slower | |
| $4.19 B | SHA-256 @ 3.62 EH/s | 48 MW | 1,522 confs | 10d 6h | 216x slower | |
| $3.43 B | Scrypt @ 2.78 PH/s | 584 MW | 490 confs | 20h 41m | 18x slower | |
| $1.13 B | Etchash @ 191 TH/s | 392 MW | 8,152 confs | 1d 6h | 27x slower | |
| $454.36 M | X11 @ 2.64 PH/s | 4.23 MW | 65,047 confs | 118d 22h | 2,493x slower | |
| $77.04 M | RandomX @ 58 MH/s | 369 KW | 1,962,375 confs | 3y 267d | 28,564x slower | |
| $71.65 M | KawPow @ 1.85 TH/s | 9.09 MW | 79,670 confs | 55d 7h | 1,160x slower | |
| $55.90 M | Eaglesong @ 90 PH/s | 4.37 MW | 983,547 confs | 115d 42m | 2,411x slower | |
| $128,226 | RandomX @ 3.21 MH/s | 20 KW | 4,195,226 confs | 68y 40d | 521,095x slower | |
| $55,432 | KawPow @ 530 MH/s | 2.61 KW | 554,838,477 confs | 527y 297d | 4,038,126x slower |