
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.49 T | SHA-256 @ 866 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 8m | - | |
| $16.04 B | Scrypt @ 2.82 PH/s | 592 MW | 1,297 confs | 22h 41m | 20x slower | |
| $8.81 B | SHA-256 @ 5.88 EH/s | 79 MW | 1,011 confs | 7d 1h | 147x slower | |
| $6.32 B | RandomX @ 5.71 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,487 confs | 15d 13h | 325x slower | |
| $5.76 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 46 MW | 13,716 confs | 11d 21h | 249x slower | |
| $4.24 B | Scrypt @ 2.66 PH/s | 558 MW | 559 confs | 1d 4m | 21x slower | |
| $1.31 B | Etchash @ 198 TH/s | 405 MW | 8,734 confs | 1d 9h | 29x slower | |
| $483.84 M | X11 @ 4.86 PH/s | 7.80 MW | 39,995 confs | 71d 18h | 1,500x slower | |
| $112.98 M | RandomX @ 99 MH/s | 627 KW | 1,262,990 confs | 2y 161d | 18,636x slower | |
| $92.74 M | KawPow @ 2.68 TH/s | 13 MW | 60,972 confs | 42d 8h | 885x slower | |
| $72.34 M | Eaglesong @ 87 PH/s | 4.22 MW | 942,109 confs | 132d 10h | 2,768x slower | |
| $233,296 | RandomX @ 783 KH/s | 4.93 KW | 1,760,638 confs | 310y 333d | 2,371,792x slower | |
| $55,922 | KawPow @ 1.09 GH/s | 5.39 KW | 299,214,760 confs | 284y 234d | 2,171,370x slower |