
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.54 T | SHA-256 @ 986 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 59m 30s | - | |
| $15.85 B | Scrypt @ 3.09 PH/s | 648 MW | 1,183 confs | 20h 22m | 21x slower | |
| $9.59 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 47 MW | 13,202 confs | 11d 11h | 277x slower | |
| $7.42 B | SHA-256 @ 4.06 EH/s | 54 MW | 1,221 confs | 10d 48m | 243x slower | |
| $7.28 B | RandomX @ 6.27 GH/s | 39 MW | 9,785 confs | 13d 22h | 337x slower | |
| $4.18 B | Scrypt @ 2.92 PH/s | 612 MW | 528 confs | 21h 33m | 22x slower | |
| $1.39 B | Etchash @ 190 TH/s | 390 MW | 8,948 confs | 1d 9h | 34x slower | |
| $533.34 M | X11 @ 3.06 PH/s | 4.91 MW | 62,470 confs | 112d 1h | 2,712x slower | |
| $90.09 M | RandomX @ 81 MH/s | 513 KW | 1,542,102 confs | 2y 340d | 25,918x slower | |
| $88.17 M | KawPow @ 2.46 TH/s | 12 MW | 65,370 confs | 45d 9h | 1,099x slower | |
| $68.70 M | Eaglesong @ 96 PH/s | 4.67 MW | 887,948 confs | 117d 18h | 2,851x slower | |
| $210,794 | RandomX @ 4.29 MH/s | 26 KW | 2,574,808 confs | 55y 308d | 493,324x slower | |
| $49,933 | KawPow @ 848 MH/s | 4.18 KW | 391,931,184 confs | 360y 150d | 3,183,755x slower |