
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.40 T | SHA-256 @ 996 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 1h 2m | - | |
| $15.87 B | Scrypt @ 3.22 PH/s | 677 MW | 1,184 confs | 20h 43m | 20x slower | |
| $9.16 B | SHA-256 @ 7.78 EH/s | 105 MW | 924 confs | 5d 13h | 128x slower | |
| $6.25 B | RandomX @ 5.85 GH/s | 36 MW | 11,313 confs | 15d 20h | 365x slower | |
| $4.29 B | Scrypt @ 2.98 PH/s | 625 MW | 585 confs | 22h 25m | 22x slower | |
| $3.93 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 42 MW | 15,780 confs | 13d 16h | 316x slower | |
| $1.30 B | Etchash @ 196 TH/s | 403 MW | 9,247 confs | 1d 10h | 33x slower | |
| $398.00 M | X11 @ 3.02 PH/s | 4.85 MW | 65,859 confs | 120d 10h | 2,775x slower | |
| $114.48 M | RandomX @ 169 MH/s | 1.07 MW | 842,375 confs | 1y 180d | 12,579x slower | |
| $88.66 M | KawPow @ 3.65 TH/s | 17 MW | 47,531 confs | 32d 10h | 748x slower | |
| $71.56 M | Eaglesong @ 103 PH/s | 5.00 MW | 933,913 confs | 116d 19h | 2,692x slower | |
| $303,281 | RandomX @ 2.26 MH/s | 14 KW | 1,652,658 confs | 112y 73d | 943,557x slower | |
| $104,421 | KawPow @ 2.55 GH/s | 12 KW | 134,173,809 confs | 127y 233d | 1,073,390x slower |