
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.41 T | SHA-256 @ 906 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 8m | - | |
| $16.12 B | Scrypt @ 4.10 PH/s | 861 MW | 931 confs | 16h 17m | 14x slower | |
| $9.55 B | SHA-256 @ 6.32 EH/s | 85 MW | 978 confs | 6d 20h | 144x slower | |
| $6.27 B | RandomX @ 5.51 GH/s | 34 MW | 11,639 confs | 16d 20h | 353x slower | |
| $4.34 B | Scrypt @ 2.68 PH/s | 562 MW | 580 confs | 1d 58m | 22x slower | |
| $4.07 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 45 MW | 14,650 confs | 12d 17h | 267x slower | |
| $1.35 B | Etchash @ 200 TH/s | 411 MW | 9,064 confs | 1d 10h | 30x slower | |
| $437.80 M | X11 @ 2.00 PH/s | 3.21 MW | 100,829 confs | 182d 1h | 3,816x slower | |
| $104.15 M | RandomX @ 94 MH/s | 595 KW | 1,413,112 confs | 2y 251d | 20,569x slower | |
| $91.29 M | KawPow @ 3.50 TH/s | 17 MW | 48,841 confs | 33d 22h | 711x slower | |
| $70.40 M | Eaglesong @ 115 PH/s | 5.62 MW | 790,426 confs | 103d 21h | 2,178x slower | |
| $294,109 | RandomX @ 11 MH/s | 73 KW | 1,916,217 confs | 21y 274d | 166,425x slower | |
| $101,216 | KawPow @ 2.54 GH/s | 12 KW | 139,055,997 confs | 127y 318d | 978,317x slower |