
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.48 T | SHA-256 @ 1,027 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 58m 6s | - | |
| $15.58 B | Scrypt @ 3.53 PH/s | 741 MW | 1,035 confs | 18h 6m | 19x slower | |
| $9.72 B | Equihash @ 18 GH/s | 60 MW | 10,586 confs | 9d 4h | 228x slower | |
| $6.74 B | RandomX @ 5.22 GH/s | 32 MW | 12,354 confs | 17d 22m | 422x slower | |
| $6.09 B | SHA-256 @ 4.15 EH/s | 55 MW | 1,389 confs | 9d 23h | 248x slower | |
| $4.03 B | Scrypt @ 2.89 PH/s | 607 MW | 524 confs | 22h 7m | 23x slower | |
| $1.29 B | Etchash @ 199 TH/s | 407 MW | 8,810 confs | 1d 8h | 34x slower | |
| $514.25 M | X11 @ 2.44 PH/s | 3.92 MW | 78,647 confs | 142d 21h | 3,542x slower | |
| $86.77 M | KawPow @ 2.47 TH/s | 12 MW | 67,240 confs | 45d 21h | 1,138x slower | |
| $81.42 M | RandomX @ 73 MH/s | 462 KW | 1,802,393 confs | 3y 114d | 29,988x slower | |
| $64.31 M | Eaglesong @ 76 PH/s | 3.70 MW | 1,282,707 confs | 151d 7h | 3,751x slower | |
| $204,397 | RandomX @ 193 KH/s | 1.22 KW | 1,917,931 confs | 1255y 164d | 11,357,384x slower | |
| $38,725 | KawPow @ 558 MH/s | 2.75 KW | 586,217,363 confs | 557y 242d | 5,044,900x slower |