
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.56 T | SHA-256 @ 1,016 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 57m 42s | - | |
| $16.06 B | Scrypt @ 4.09 PH/s | 858 MW | 880 confs | 15h 24m | 16x slower | |
| $11.25 B | Equihash @ 17 GH/s | 57 MW | 11,169 confs | 9d 13h | 239x slower | |
| $7.56 B | RandomX @ 5.83 GH/s | 36 MW | 10,355 confs | 14d 23h | 374x slower | |
| $7.51 B | SHA-256 @ 4.78 EH/s | 64 MW | 1,225 confs | 8d 12h | 213x slower | |
| $4.17 B | Scrypt @ 3.09 PH/s | 648 MW | 509 confs | 20h 21m | 21x slower | |
| $1.41 B | Etchash @ 188 TH/s | 385 MW | 9,134 confs | 1d 10h | 36x slower | |
| $636.03 M | X11 @ 2.47 PH/s | 3.96 MW | 76,977 confs | 138d 23h | 3,469x slower | |
| $89.07 M | KawPow @ 2.59 TH/s | 12 MW | 61,980 confs | 43d 1h | 1,074x slower | |
| $86.26 M | RandomX @ 77 MH/s | 487 KW | 1,599,412 confs | 3y 34d | 28,181x slower | |
| $70.03 M | Eaglesong @ 97 PH/s | 4.71 MW | 1,001,112 confs | 116d 17h | 2,913x slower | |
| $223,829 | RandomX @ 2.53 MH/s | 15 KW | 2,574,808 confs | 94y 259d | 862,732x slower | |
| $49,082 | KawPow @ 797 MH/s | 3.93 KW | 403,089,853 confs | 383y 166d | 3,492,980x slower |