
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.22 T | SHA-256 @ 835 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 11m | - | |
| $13.97 B | Scrypt @ 2.20 PH/s | 462 MW | 1,661 confs | 1d 5h | 24x slower | |
| $6.19 B | Equihash @ 20 GH/s | 69 MW | 9,283 confs | 8d 1h | 163x slower | |
| $5.41 B | RandomX @ 5.78 GH/s | 36 MW | 11,548 confs | 15d 8h | 310x slower | |
| $4.36 B | SHA-256 @ 3.88 EH/s | 52 MW | 1,495 confs | 10d 16h | 215x slower | |
| $3.20 B | Scrypt @ 2.81 PH/s | 589 MW | 547 confs | 22h 47m | 19x slower | |
| $1.07 B | Etchash @ 185 TH/s | 380 MW | 9,369 confs | 1d 11h | 30x slower | |
| $416.35 M | X11 @ 2.29 PH/s | 3.67 MW | 82,870 confs | 152d 12h | 3,076x slower | |
| $81.02 M | RandomX @ 81 MH/s | 512 KW | 1,626,338 confs | 2y 361d | 22,019x slower | |
| $68.20 M | KawPow @ 2.10 TH/s | 10 MW | 77,870 confs | 54d 1h | 1,091x slower | |
| $51.11 M | Eaglesong @ 94 PH/s | 4.60 MW | 1,006,732 confs | 121d 12h | 2,451x slower | |
| $146,322 | RandomX @ 281 KH/s | 1.77 KW | 2,971,231 confs | 864y 58d | 6,361,374x slower | |
| $44,574 | KawPow @ 597 MH/s | 2.95 KW | 547,110,616 confs | 520y 168d | 3,831,307x slower |