
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.42 T | SHA-256 @ 1,085 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 55m | - | |
| $14.01 B | Scrypt @ 2.19 PH/s | 460 MW | 1,641 confs | 1d 5h | 32x slower | |
| $8.47 B | SHA-256 @ 6.09 EH/s | 82 MW | 962 confs | 6d 19h | 178x slower | |
| $6.19 B | RandomX @ 5.78 GH/s | 36 MW | 11,561 confs | 15d 9h | 403x slower | |
| $6.04 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 46 MW | 13,742 confs | 11d 22h | 312x slower | |
| $4.13 B | Scrypt @ 2.75 PH/s | 578 MW | 554 confs | 23h 14m | 25x slower | |
| $1.28 B | Etchash @ 205 TH/s | 421 MW | 8,589 confs | 1d 7h | 35x slower | |
| $523.95 M | X11 @ 2.92 PH/s | 4.68 MW | 65,804 confs | 119d 13h | 3,131x slower | |
| $114.55 M | RandomX @ 103 MH/s | 652 KW | 1,277,125 confs | 2y 127d | 22,446x slower | |
| $90.38 M | KawPow @ 2.49 TH/s | 12 MW | 65,714 confs | 45d 15h | 1,195x slower | |
| $72.03 M | Eaglesong @ 131 PH/s | 6.36 MW | 645,425 confs | 87d 23h | 2,303x slower | |
| $231,734 | RandomX @ 657 KH/s | 4.14 KW | 1,304,192 confs | 370y 93d | 3,538,310x slower | |
| $88,863 | KawPow @ 2.16 GH/s | 10 KW | 151,406,314 confs | 144y 11d | 1,376,421x slower |