
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.55 T | SHA-256 @ 942 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 1m | - | |
| $15.19 B | Scrypt @ 2.89 PH/s | 607 MW | 1,232 confs | 21h 33m | 21x slower | |
| $9.02 B | SHA-256 @ 5.40 EH/s | 72 MW | 1,015 confs | 7d 11h | 175x slower | |
| $7.00 B | RandomX @ 5.60 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,152 confs | 15d 11h | 361x slower | |
| $5.86 B | Equihash @ 16 GH/s | 54 MW | 11,622 confs | 9d 22h | 232x slower | |
| $4.28 B | Scrypt @ 2.68 PH/s | 563 MW | 607 confs | 23h 16m | 23x slower | |
| $1.31 B | Etchash @ 195 TH/s | 400 MW | 8,680 confs | 1d 8h | 32x slower | |
| $450.28 M | X11 @ 2.46 PH/s | 3.94 MW | 75,240 confs | 138d 11h | 3,226x slower | |
| $98.28 M | RandomX @ 80 MH/s | 509 KW | 1,517,553 confs | 2y 341d | 24,965x slower | |
| $95.13 M | KawPow @ 2.40 TH/s | 11 MW | 66,376 confs | 46d 2h | 1,074x slower | |
| $73.09 M | Eaglesong @ 110 PH/s | 5.38 MW | 728,565 confs | 101d 12h | 2,366x slower | |
| $248,419 | RandomX @ 602 KH/s | 3.80 KW | 1,717,916 confs | 394y 5d | 3,351,047x slower | |
| $53,932 | KawPow @ 696 MH/s | 3.43 KW | 458,085,043 confs | 435y 282d | 3,706,190x slower |