
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.31 T | SHA-256 @ 895 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 59m 54s | - | |
| $13.71 B | Scrypt @ 2.67 PH/s | 560 MW | 1,231 confs | 21h 32m | 22x slower | |
| $7.86 B | Equihash @ 22 GH/s | 75 MW | 7,657 confs | 6d 15h | 160x slower | |
| $6.38 B | RandomX @ 6.16 GH/s | 38 MW | 9,571 confs | 12d 23h | 312x slower | |
| $4.23 B | SHA-256 @ 3.38 EH/s | 45 MW | 1,553 confs | 11d 52m | 265x slower | |
| $3.49 B | Scrypt @ 2.83 PH/s | 593 MW | 495 confs | 20h 21m | 20x slower | |
| $1.13 B | Etchash @ 188 TH/s | 386 MW | 8,289 confs | 1d 7h | 31x slower | |
| $478.83 M | X11 @ 3.13 PH/s | 5.03 MW | 56,159 confs | 100d 2h | 2,406x slower | |
| $83.04 M | RandomX @ 87 MH/s | 553 KW | 1,403,234 confs | 2y 179d | 21,865x slower | |
| $72.75 M | KawPow @ 2.06 TH/s | 10 MW | 72,466 confs | 49d 11h | 1,190x slower | |
| $56.54 M | Eaglesong @ 89 PH/s | 4.36 MW | 959,996 confs | 115d 8h | 2,773x slower | |
| $122,086 | RandomX @ 2.26 MH/s | 14 KW | 4,195,227 confs | 96y 357d | 850,952x slower | |
| $55,436 | KawPow @ 700 MH/s | 3.45 KW | 419,819,685 confs | 399y 135d | 3,504,338x slower |