
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.49 T | SHA-256 @ 1,088 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 53m 30s | - | |
| $14.39 B | Scrypt @ 3.76 PH/s | 790 MW | 948 confs | 16h 35m | 19x slower | |
| $8.77 B | SHA-256 @ 5.47 EH/s | 73 MW | 996 confs | 7d 9h | 199x slower | |
| $6.42 B | RandomX @ 5.18 GH/s | 32 MW | 11,848 confs | 16d 17h | 450x slower | |
| $5.06 B | Equihash @ 10 GH/s | 36 MW | 17,370 confs | 15d 1h | 406x slower | |
| $4.18 B | Scrypt @ 2.57 PH/s | 538 MW | 558 confs | 1d 20m | 27x slower | |
| $1.30 B | Etchash @ 201 TH/s | 413 MW | 8,418 confs | 1d 7h | 36x slower | |
| $429.35 M | X11 @ 2.52 PH/s | 4.04 MW | 73,378 confs | 135d 51m | 3,635x slower | |
| $115.22 M | RandomX @ 96 MH/s | 604 KW | 1,299,837 confs | 2y 172d | 24,296x slower | |
| $93.67 M | KawPow @ 2.69 TH/s | 13 MW | 59,287 confs | 41d 4h | 1,108x slower | |
| $72.68 M | Eaglesong @ 144 PH/s | 7.02 MW | 530,838 confs | 77d 18h | 2,093x slower | |
| $251,226 | RandomX @ 876 KH/s | 5.52 KW | 1,717,916 confs | 271y 64d | 2,664,107x slower | |
| $66,978 | KawPow @ 1.03 GH/s | 5.06 KW | 310,898,183 confs | 295y 275d | 2,905,590x slower |