
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.43 T | SHA-256 @ 935 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 6m | - | |
| $14.75 B | Scrypt @ 3.20 PH/s | 672 MW | 1,210 confs | 20h 50m | 19x slower | |
| $9.17 B | SHA-256 @ 6.65 EH/s | 89 MW | 937 confs | 6d 12h | 141x slower | |
| $6.53 B | RandomX @ 6.06 GH/s | 38 MW | 11,296 confs | 15d 7h | 331x slower | |
| $4.23 B | Scrypt @ 3.19 PH/s | 669 MW | 520 confs | 20h 56m | 19x slower | |
| $3.52 B | Equihash @ 17 GH/s | 57 MW | 11,958 confs | 10d 5h | 221x slower | |
| $1.30 B | Etchash @ 201 TH/s | 412 MW | 9,041 confs | 1d 9h | 31x slower | |
| $418.56 M | X11 @ 2.20 PH/s | 3.53 MW | 91,711 confs | 165d 14h | 3,580x slower | |
| $122.42 M | RandomX @ 125 MH/s | 790 KW | 1,081,429 confs | 2y 8d | 15,967x slower | |
| $88.55 M | KawPow @ 3.23 TH/s | 15 MW | 52,900 confs | 36d 17h | 794x slower | |
| $76.34 M | Eaglesong @ 70 PH/s | 3.40 MW | 1,202,195 confs | 171d 22h | 3,718x slower | |
| $266,715 | RandomX @ 8.53 MH/s | 53 KW | 1,582,059 confs | 29y 291d | 235,171x slower | |
| $101,098 | KawPow @ 2.81 GH/s | 13 KW | 125,811,716 confs | 115y 253d | 913,048x slower |