
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.35 T | SHA-256 @ 827 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 12m | - | |
| $15.58 B | Scrypt @ 2.62 PH/s | 549 MW | 1,397 confs | 1d 26m | 20x slower | |
| $8.83 B | SHA-256 @ 6.45 EH/s | 87 MW | 916 confs | 6d 10h | 128x slower | |
| $5.96 B | RandomX @ 5.30 GH/s | 33 MW | 11,974 confs | 16d 18h | 335x slower | |
| $4.14 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 45 MW | 14,303 confs | 12d 9h | 248x slower | |
| $4.13 B | Scrypt @ 2.72 PH/s | 572 MW | 560 confs | 23h 29m | 20x slower | |
| $1.34 B | Etchash @ 200 TH/s | 409 MW | 8,797 confs | 1d 8h | 27x slower | |
| $387.67 M | X11 @ 2.68 PH/s | 4.30 MW | 72,462 confs | 129d 23h | 2,596x slower | |
| $135.13 M | RandomX @ 127 MH/s | 804 KW | 1,001,029 confs | 1y 330d | 13,884x slower | |
| $93.47 M | KawPow @ 3.01 TH/s | 14 MW | 54,406 confs | 37d 18h | 755x slower | |
| $70.60 M | Eaglesong @ 140 PH/s | 6.80 MW | 686,500 confs | 82d 7h | 1,644x slower | |
| $263,822 | RandomX @ 887 KH/s | 5.59 KW | 1,304,191 confs | 274y 159d | 2,000,603x slower | |
| $93,428 | KawPow @ 1.82 GH/s | 8.96 KW | 179,820,369 confs | 171y 22d | 1,247,021x slower |