
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.28 T | SHA-256 @ 872 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 1m | - | |
| $14.16 B | Scrypt @ 2.79 PH/s | 585 MW | 1,198 confs | 20h 37m | 20x slower | |
| $7.37 B | Equihash @ 19 GH/s | 64 MW | 9,046 confs | 7d 17h | 181x slower | |
| $6.05 B | RandomX @ 5.41 GH/s | 34 MW | 10,552 confs | 14d 18h | 346x slower | |
| $3.96 B | SHA-256 @ 3.35 EH/s | 45 MW | 1,633 confs | 11d 2h | 260x slower | |
| $3.47 B | Scrypt @ 2.69 PH/s | 564 MW | 504 confs | 21h 25m | 21x slower | |
| $1.15 B | Etchash @ 187 TH/s | 383 MW | 8,341 confs | 1d 7h | 31x slower | |
| $447.48 M | X11 @ 2.23 PH/s | 3.58 MW | 77,363 confs | 140d 13h | 3,292x slower | |
| $75.65 M | RandomX @ 75 MH/s | 474 KW | 1,608,148 confs | 2y 330d | 24,841x slower | |
| $67.24 M | KawPow @ 1.96 TH/s | 9.64 MW | 75,179 confs | 52d 4h | 1,222x slower | |
| $51.25 M | Eaglesong @ 65 PH/s | 3.18 MW | 1,113,084 confs | 158d 7h | 3,706x slower | |
| $116,756 | RandomX @ 2.49 MH/s | 15 KW | 4,691,530 confs | 88y 25d | 752,679x slower | |
| $62,834 | KawPow @ 636 MH/s | 3.13 KW | 462,423,037 confs | 439y 328d | 3,759,537x slower |