
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.46 T | SHA-256 @ 941 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 5m | - | |
| $16.62 B | Scrypt @ 2.79 PH/s | 586 MW | 1,360 confs | 23h 48m | 22x slower | |
| $9.26 B | SHA-256 @ 6.14 EH/s | 82 MW | 981 confs | 7d 24m | 153x slower | |
| $6.57 B | RandomX @ 5.69 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,137 confs | 16d 5h | 355x slower | |
| $4.36 B | Scrypt @ 2.83 PH/s | 594 MW | 535 confs | 23h 28m | 21x slower | |
| $4.02 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 42 MW | 15,640 confs | 13d 13h | 297x slower | |
| $1.38 B | Etchash @ 202 TH/s | 415 MW | 8,892 confs | 1d 9h | 31x slower | |
| $440.74 M | X11 @ 2.77 PH/s | 4.45 MW | 72,435 confs | 130d 18h | 2,858x slower | |
| $131.92 M | RandomX @ 151 MH/s | 956 KW | 938,282 confs | 1y 243d | 13,289x slower | |
| $92.18 M | KawPow @ 3.33 TH/s | 16 MW | 50,985 confs | 35d 9h | 774x slower | |
| $74.57 M | Eaglesong @ 99 PH/s | 4.81 MW | 1,048,298 confs | 120d 20h | 2,640x slower | |
| $367,446 | RandomX @ 3.71 MH/s | 23 KW | 4,775,432 confs | 68y 52d | 543,486x slower | |
| $103,246 | KawPow @ 2.71 GH/s | 13 KW | 129,857,486 confs | 119y 151d | 952,420x slower |