
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.52 T | SHA-256 @ 954 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 1m | - | |
| $15.68 B | Scrypt @ 3.58 PH/s | 752 MW | 1,003 confs | 17h 33m | 17x slower | |
| $9.65 B | Equihash @ 16 GH/s | 56 MW | 11,452 confs | 9d 19h | 230x slower | |
| $7.03 B | RandomX @ 6.03 GH/s | 37 MW | 9,627 confs | 14d 11h | 339x slower | |
| $6.92 B | SHA-256 @ 4.65 EH/s | 62 MW | 1,237 confs | 8d 18h | 205x slower | |
| $4.02 B | Scrypt @ 3.15 PH/s | 660 MW | 511 confs | 20h 51s | 19x slower | |
| $1.36 B | Etchash @ 201 TH/s | 412 MW | 8,583 confs | 1d 8h | 31x slower | |
| $555.74 M | X11 @ 4.09 PH/s | 6.56 MW | 46,723 confs | 83d 19h | 1,963x slower | |
| $86.54 M | KawPow @ 2.65 TH/s | 13 MW | 60,696 confs | 42d 3h | 987x slower | |
| $85.62 M | RandomX @ 70 MH/s | 442 KW | 1,789,174 confs | 3y 147d | 29,092x slower | |
| $66.62 M | Eaglesong @ 114 PH/s | 5.54 MW | 972,426 confs | 99d 4h | 2,323x slower | |
| $214,526 | RandomX @ 441 KH/s | 2.78 KW | 1,885,517 confs | 542y 18d | 4,632,546x slower | |
| $45,696 | KawPow @ 642 MH/s | 3.16 KW | 500,694,426 confs | 476y 112d | 4,070,686x slower |