
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.53 T | SHA-256 @ 912 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 3m | - | |
| $14.66 B | Scrypt @ 2.83 PH/s | 595 MW | 1,258 confs | 22h 54s | 21x slower | |
| $8.99 B | SHA-256 @ 5.16 EH/s | 69 MW | 1,006 confs | 7d 20h | 177x slower | |
| $7.14 B | RandomX @ 5.20 GH/s | 32 MW | 12,007 confs | 16d 16h | 376x slower | |
| $5.30 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 47 MW | 13,284 confs | 11d 12h | 260x slower | |
| $4.29 B | Scrypt @ 2.74 PH/s | 575 MW | 558 confs | 22h 47m | 21x slower | |
| $1.32 B | Etchash @ 201 TH/s | 412 MW | 8,526 confs | 1d 7h | 30x slower | |
| $470.96 M | X11 @ 3.01 PH/s | 4.83 MW | 61,376 confs | 112d 22h | 2,549x slower | |
| $109.20 M | RandomX @ 75 MH/s | 472 KW | 1,610,737 confs | 3y 60d | 26,088x slower | |
| $97.39 M | KawPow @ 2.39 TH/s | 11 MW | 66,791 confs | 46d 9h | 1,047x slower | |
| $72.99 M | Eaglesong @ 120 PH/s | 5.84 MW | 754,306 confs | 93d 13h | 2,112x slower | |
| $257,695 | RandomX @ 683 KH/s | 4.30 KW | 1,717,916 confs | 347y 200d | 2,863,193x slower | |
| $70,222 | KawPow @ 1.27 GH/s | 6.23 KW | 261,025,466 confs | 240y 12d | 1,977,466x slower |