
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.28 T | SHA-256 @ 979 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 54m 48s | - | |
| $14.03 B | Scrypt @ 3.20 PH/s | 671 MW | 1,027 confs | 17h 58m | 20x slower | |
| $7.37 B | Equihash @ 21 GH/s | 71 MW | 8,071 confs | 7d 8m | 184x slower | |
| $6.12 B | RandomX @ 5.36 GH/s | 33 MW | 10,907 confs | 14d 21h | 391x slower | |
| $3.93 B | SHA-256 @ 3.35 EH/s | 45 MW | 1,627 confs | 11d 3h | 292x slower | |
| $3.44 B | Scrypt @ 2.63 PH/s | 553 MW | 504 confs | 21h 50m | 24x slower | |
| $1.13 B | Etchash @ 185 TH/s | 379 MW | 8,486 confs | 1d 7h | 35x slower | |
| $439.99 M | X11 @ 2.44 PH/s | 3.91 MW | 70,868 confs | 128d 18h | 3,384x slower | |
| $76.08 M | RandomX @ 64 MH/s | 407 KW | 1,748,580 confs | 3y 139d | 32,440x slower | |
| $65.21 M | KawPow @ 1.90 TH/s | 9.34 MW | 77,569 confs | 53d 20h | 1,415x slower | |
| $50.23 M | Eaglesong @ 110 PH/s | 5.37 MW | 826,557 confs | 93d 15h | 2,461x slower | |
| $112,524 | RandomX @ 1.58 MH/s | 9.95 KW | 5,245,131 confs | 138y 199d | 1,328,830x slower | |
| $62,066 | KawPow @ 898 MH/s | 4.43 KW | 327,213,446 confs | 311y 100d | 2,985,524x slower |