
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.63 T | SHA-256 @ 991 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 57m 24s | - | |
| $19.78 B | Scrypt @ 3.05 PH/s | 640 MW | 1,143 confs | 20h 9s | 21x slower | |
| $9.34 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 43 MW | 14,250 confs | 12d 8h | 310x slower | |
| $8.74 B | SHA-256 @ 4.77 EH/s | 64 MW | 1,097 confs | 8d 6h | 208x slower | |
| $7.35 B | RandomX @ 5.88 GH/s | 36 MW | 10,381 confs | 14d 10h | 362x slower | |
| $4.51 B | Scrypt @ 2.80 PH/s | 587 MW | 497 confs | 21h 48m | 23x slower | |
| $1.49 B | Etchash @ 193 TH/s | 395 MW | 8,665 confs | 1d 8h | 34x slower | |
| $584.95 M | X11 @ 2.40 PH/s | 3.85 MW | 76,194 confs | 138d 10h | 3,473x slower | |
| $97.18 M | KawPow @ 2.00 TH/s | 9.83 MW | 78,102 confs | 54d 5h | 1,361x slower | |
| $81.04 M | RandomX @ 61 MH/s | 389 KW | 1,939,477 confs | 3y 274d | 34,352x slower | |
| $78.75 M | Eaglesong @ 111 PH/s | 5.41 MW | 795,732 confs | 98d 15h | 2,475x slower | |
| $232,568 | RandomX @ 661 KH/s | 4.17 KW | 1,678,350 confs | 350y 243d | 3,210,989x slower | |
| $67,134 | KawPow @ 940 MH/s | 4.63 KW | 331,797,526 confs | 315y 232d | 2,890,222x slower |