
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.34 T | SHA-256 @ 1,038 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 59m 42s | - | |
| $15.87 B | Scrypt @ 2.46 PH/s | 517 MW | 1,543 confs | 1d 3h | 27x slower | |
| $9.11 B | SHA-256 @ 6.58 EH/s | 88 MW | 881 confs | 6d 13h | 158x slower | |
| $6.23 B | RandomX @ 5.56 GH/s | 35 MW | 12,477 confs | 16d 14h | 401x slower | |
| $4.17 B | Scrypt @ 3.05 PH/s | 640 MW | 523 confs | 21h 47m | 22x slower | |
| $3.65 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 44 MW | 15,191 confs | 13d 4h | 318x slower | |
| $1.34 B | Etchash @ 210 TH/s | 430 MW | 8,699 confs | 1d 8h | 33x slower | |
| $416.22 M | X11 @ 2.45 PH/s | 3.93 MW | 80,959 confs | 148d 1h | 3,571x slower | |
| $123.96 M | RandomX @ 113 MH/s | 716 KW | 1,168,754 confs | 2y 81d | 19,577x slower | |
| $92.93 M | KawPow @ 3.65 TH/s | 17 MW | 46,544 confs | 32d 7h | 780x slower | |
| $76.37 M | Eaglesong @ 127 PH/s | 6.20 MW | 692,626 confs | 93d 17h | 2,261x slower | |
| $301,918 | RandomX @ 1.85 MH/s | 11 KW | 3,400,476 confs | 136y 186d | 1,201,843x slower | |
| $108,691 | KawPow @ 2.23 GH/s | 10 KW | 152,623,467 confs | 145y 69d | 1,278,253x slower |