
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.36 T | SHA-256 @ 979 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 1h 3m | - | |
| $15.19 B | Scrypt @ 4.84 PH/s | 1.02 GW | 785 confs | 13h 44m | 13x slower | |
| $8.87 B | SHA-256 @ 5.81 EH/s | 78 MW | 973 confs | 7d 9h | 169x slower | |
| $6.30 B | RandomX @ 6.34 GH/s | 39 MW | 10,951 confs | 14d 13h | 332x slower | |
| $4.21 B | Scrypt @ 3.05 PH/s | 640 MW | 523 confs | 21h 47m | 21x slower | |
| $3.66 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 44 MW | 15,127 confs | 13d 3h | 299x slower | |
| $1.32 B | Etchash @ 209 TH/s | 428 MW | 8,698 confs | 1d 8h | 31x slower | |
| $437.37 M | X11 @ 2.13 PH/s | 3.42 MW | 93,094 confs | 170d 5h | 3,873x slower | |
| $110.46 M | RandomX @ 112 MH/s | 708 KW | 1,182,188 confs | 2y 90d | 18,676x slower | |
| $90.08 M | KawPow @ 3.88 TH/s | 19 MW | 44,545 confs | 30d 10h | 692x slower | |
| $73.02 M | Eaglesong @ 132 PH/s | 6.41 MW | 722,112 confs | 90d 17h | 2,064x slower | |
| $375,077 | RandomX @ 2.66 MH/s | 16 KW | 1,393,067 confs | 95y 6d | 788,964x slower | |
| $103,948 | KawPow @ 2.29 GH/s | 11 KW | 148,657,655 confs | 141y 152d | 1,174,231x slower |