
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.29 T | SHA-256 @ 839 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 3m | - | |
| $14.69 B | Scrypt @ 2.21 PH/s | 464 MW | 1,486 confs | 1d 2h | 24x slower | |
| $8.04 B | Equihash @ 22 GH/s | 74 MW | 9,668 confs | 6d 17h | 151x slower | |
| $6.30 B | RandomX @ 6.11 GH/s | 38 MW | 9,744 confs | 13d 1h | 295x slower | |
| $4.27 B | SHA-256 @ 3.26 EH/s | 43 MW | 1,612 confs | 11d 10h | 258x slower | |
| $3.46 B | Scrypt @ 2.58 PH/s | 540 MW | 522 confs | 22h 19m | 21x slower | |
| $1.16 B | Etchash @ 193 TH/s | 395 MW | 8,167 confs | 1d 6h | 29x slower | |
| $463.81 M | X11 @ 2.67 PH/s | 4.28 MW | 64,257 confs | 117d 12h | 2,648x slower | |
| $79.61 M | RandomX @ 75 MH/s | 474 KW | 1,552,494 confs | 2y 330d | 23,891x slower | |
| $71.62 M | KawPow @ 1.97 TH/s | 9.72 MW | 75,818 confs | 51d 18h | 1,167x slower | |
| $55.83 M | Eaglesong @ 103 PH/s | 5.00 MW | 763,384 confs | 100d 13h | 2,266x slower | |
| $111,233 | RandomX @ 1.33 MH/s | 8.38 KW | 3,583,870 confs | 164y 203d | 1,353,532x slower | |
| $60,944 | KawPow @ 668 MH/s | 3.29 KW | 440,229,331 confs | 418y 287d | 3,444,674x slower |