
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.57 T | SHA-256 @ 1,036 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 56m 36s | - | |
| $18.61 B | Scrypt @ 2.60 PH/s | 545 MW | 1,382 confs | 1d 11m | 26x slower | |
| $8.53 B | Equihash @ 15 GH/s | 52 MW | 12,080 confs | 10d 11h | 267x slower | |
| $8.34 B | SHA-256 @ 5.17 EH/s | 69 MW | 1,112 confs | 7d 21h | 200x slower | |
| $7.13 B | RandomX @ 6.91 GH/s | 43 MW | 9,845 confs | 12d 15h | 322x slower | |
| $4.33 B | Scrypt @ 3.07 PH/s | 644 MW | 512 confs | 20h 28m | 22x slower | |
| $1.42 B | Etchash @ 193 TH/s | 396 MW | 8,912 confs | 1d 9h | 35x slower | |
| $522.41 M | X11 @ 2.24 PH/s | 3.59 MW | 84,431 confs | 153d 10h | 3,903x slower | |
| $90.68 M | KawPow @ 2.46 TH/s | 12 MW | 65,321 confs | 45d 8h | 1,154x slower | |
| $85.81 M | RandomX @ 78 MH/s | 493 KW | 1,633,471 confs | 3y 20d | 28,379x slower | |
| $72.19 M | Eaglesong @ 118 PH/s | 5.73 MW | 882,192 confs | 96d 59m | 2,443x slower | |
| $205,655 | RandomX @ 5.49 MH/s | 34 KW | 2,993,063 confs | 43y 205d | 404,539x slower | |
| $62,841 | KawPow @ 800 MH/s | 3.94 KW | 401,822,014 confs | 382y 91d | 3,549,664x slower |