
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.53 T | SHA-256 @ 939 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 2m | - | |
| $15.35 B | Scrypt @ 3.19 PH/s | 669 MW | 1,138 confs | 19h 35m | 19x slower | |
| $9.05 B | SHA-256 @ 6.10 EH/s | 82 MW | 1,000 confs | 6d 15h | 154x slower | |
| $6.95 B | RandomX @ 5.67 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,194 confs | 15d 6h | 355x slower | |
| $5.60 B | Equihash @ 10 GH/s | 33 MW | 18,334 confs | 16d 3h | 375x slower | |
| $4.29 B | Scrypt @ 2.72 PH/s | 571 MW | 607 confs | 22h 55m | 22x slower | |
| $1.31 B | Etchash @ 201 TH/s | 413 MW | 8,501 confs | 1d 7h | 31x slower | |
| $441.81 M | X11 @ 2.28 PH/s | 3.65 MW | 81,780 confs | 149d 13h | 3,473x slower | |
| $97.61 M | RandomX @ 84 MH/s | 529 KW | 1,510,566 confs | 2y 301d | 23,958x slower | |
| $96.00 M | KawPow @ 2.44 TH/s | 12 MW | 65,449 confs | 45d 10h | 1,056x slower | |
| $73.73 M | Eaglesong @ 108 PH/s | 5.26 MW | 635,542 confs | 103d 20h | 2,412x slower | |
| $246,752 | RandomX @ 964 KH/s | 6.08 KW | 1,717,915 confs | 246y 82d | 2,087,359x slower | |
| $54,318 | KawPow @ 1.06 GH/s | 5.20 KW | 312,644,960 confs | 287y 183d | 2,437,286x slower |