
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.55 T | SHA-256 @ 894 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 5m | - | |
| $17.46 B | Scrypt @ 4.10 PH/s | 861 MW | 876 confs | 15h 19m | 14x slower | |
| $10.99 B | Equihash @ 17 GH/s | 56 MW | 11,174 confs | 9d 16h | 213x slower | |
| $7.28 B | RandomX @ 6.34 GH/s | 39 MW | 10,352 confs | 13d 18h | 302x slower | |
| $6.97 B | SHA-256 @ 4.84 EH/s | 65 MW | 1,195 confs | 8d 10h | 185x slower | |
| $4.08 B | Scrypt @ 3.17 PH/s | 665 MW | 511 confs | 19h 52m | 18x slower | |
| $1.40 B | Etchash @ 195 TH/s | 399 MW | 8,750 confs | 1d 9h | 30x slower | |
| $590.13 M | X11 @ 2.31 PH/s | 3.70 MW | 82,284 confs | 148d 13h | 3,261x slower | |
| $87.08 M | KawPow @ 2.34 TH/s | 11 MW | 68,671 confs | 47d 16h | 1,047x slower | |
| $85.99 M | RandomX @ 74 MH/s | 472 KW | 1,706,327 confs | 3y 70d | 25,578x slower | |
| $67.67 M | Eaglesong @ 108 PH/s | 5.28 MW | 926,813 confs | 104d 4h | 2,287x slower | |
| $198,871 | RandomX @ 588 KH/s | 3.71 KW | 1,885,516 confs | 406y 163d | 3,256,538x slower | |
| $45,690 | KawPow @ 561 MH/s | 2.77 KW | 572,334,684 confs | 544y 167d | 4,362,307x slower |