
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.20 T | SHA-256 @ 976 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 58m 54s | - | |
| $12.26 B | Scrypt @ 2.96 PH/s | 621 MW | 1,210 confs | 20h 50m | 21x slower | |
| $6.92 B | Equihash @ 17 GH/s | 59 MW | 10,522 confs | 9d 3h | 223x slower | |
| $5.78 B | RandomX @ 5.00 GH/s | 31 MW | 12,124 confs | 17d 2h | 419x slower | |
| $4.25 B | SHA-256 @ 3.17 EH/s | 42 MW | 1,755 confs | 12d 14h | 308x slower | |
| $3.29 B | Scrypt @ 2.38 PH/s | 499 MW | 569 confs | 1d 1h | 26x slower | |
| $1.10 B | Etchash @ 185 TH/s | 379 MW | 9,036 confs | 1d 10h | 35x slower | |
| $422.41 M | X11 @ 1.76 PH/s | 2.82 MW | 105,358 confs | 191d 10h | 4,681x slower | |
| $71.03 M | RandomX @ 69 MH/s | 438 KW | 1,800,690 confs | 3y 134d | 30,062x slower | |
| $61.25 M | KawPow @ 1.35 TH/s | 6.66 MW | 116,587 confs | 80d 23h | 1,979x slower | |
| $43.56 M | Eaglesong @ 72 PH/s | 3.50 MW | 1,398,536 confs | 154d 1h | 3,767x slower | |
| $102,717 | RandomX @ 1.04 MH/s | 6.53 KW | 6,468,891 confs | 226y 93d | 2,019,011x slower | |
| $56,473 | KawPow @ 695 MH/s | 3.43 KW | 453,163,966 confs | 431y 33d | 3,846,893x slower |