
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.46 T | SHA-256 @ 909 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 8m | - | |
| $15.00 B | Scrypt @ 3.24 PH/s | 680 MW | 1,178 confs | 20h 36m | 18x slower | |
| $9.38 B | SHA-256 @ 6.78 EH/s | 91 MW | 922 confs | 6d 9h | 134x slower | |
| $6.54 B | RandomX @ 5.27 GH/s | 33 MW | 12,066 confs | 17d 14h | 370x slower | |
| $4.32 B | Scrypt @ 2.73 PH/s | 574 MW | 564 confs | 1d 26m | 21x slower | |
| $3.81 B | Equihash @ 11 GH/s | 39 MW | 17,155 confs | 14d 21h | 313x slower | |
| $1.32 B | Etchash @ 199 TH/s | 408 MW | 9,061 confs | 1d 10h | 30x slower | |
| $426.88 M | X11 @ 2.64 PH/s | 4.23 MW | 76,522 confs | 138d 3h | 2,904x slower | |
| $112.84 M | RandomX @ 107 MH/s | 675 KW | 1,266,026 confs | 2y 134d | 18,174x slower | |
| $89.46 M | KawPow @ 3.75 TH/s | 18 MW | 45,527 confs | 31d 14h | 665x slower | |
| $75.64 M | Eaglesong @ 131 PH/s | 6.39 MW | 756,530 confs | 91d 8h | 1,921x slower | |
| $262,946 | RandomX @ 9.15 MH/s | 57 KW | 1,867,878 confs | 27y 284d | 213,147x slower | |
| $101,122 | KawPow @ 2.41 GH/s | 11 KW | 141,852,460 confs | 134y 344d | 1,035,419x slower |