
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.33 T | SHA-256 @ 985 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 1h 3m | - | |
| $13.78 B | Scrypt @ 2.90 PH/s | 609 MW | 1,314 confs | 22h 59m | 22x slower | |
| $8.90 B | SHA-256 @ 6.63 EH/s | 89 MW | 969 confs | 6d 12h | 149x slower | |
| $6.17 B | RandomX @ 5.46 GH/s | 34 MW | 12,124 confs | 16d 23h | 387x slower | |
| $4.07 B | Scrypt @ 2.99 PH/s | 627 MW | 529 confs | 22h 20m | 21x slower | |
| $3.31 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 42 MW | 15,704 confs | 13d 15h | 311x slower | |
| $1.25 B | Etchash @ 203 TH/s | 417 MW | 8,949 confs | 1d 9h | 32x slower | |
| $385.88 M | X11 @ 2.02 PH/s | 3.24 MW | 99,277 confs | 180d 9h | 4,110x slower | |
| $117.63 M | RandomX @ 108 MH/s | 686 KW | 1,185,994 confs | 2y 121d | 19,391x slower | |
| $85.95 M | KawPow @ 3.83 TH/s | 18 MW | 44,566 confs | 30d 22h | 705x slower | |
| $68.76 M | Eaglesong @ 138 PH/s | 6.71 MW | 675,891 confs | 87d 1h | 1,984x slower | |
| $265,479 | RandomX @ 2.04 MH/s | 12 KW | 1,199,181 confs | 124y 97d | 1,033,471x slower | |
| $119,172 | KawPow @ 2.31 GH/s | 11 KW | 147,737,844 confs | 140y 197d | 1,168,812x slower |