
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.57 T | SHA-256 @ 1,012 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 56m 12s | - | |
| $18.31 B | Scrypt @ 2.71 PH/s | 569 MW | 1,285 confs | 22h 29m | 24x slower | |
| $8.84 B | SHA-256 @ 4.37 EH/s | 58 MW | 1,058 confs | 9d 1h | 232x slower | |
| $7.22 B | RandomX @ 6.08 GH/s | 38 MW | 10,465 confs | 13d 22h | 357x slower | |
| $6.87 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 48 MW | 12,662 confs | 10d 23h | 282x slower | |
| $4.25 B | Scrypt @ 2.70 PH/s | 566 MW | 490 confs | 22h 35m | 24x slower | |
| $1.32 B | Etchash @ 200 TH/s | 410 MW | 8,356 confs | 1d 7h | 33x slower | |
| $499.31 M | X11 @ 2.94 PH/s | 4.71 MW | 62,696 confs | 113d 4h | 2,901x slower | |
| $94.82 M | KawPow @ 2.18 TH/s | 10 MW | 72,665 confs | 49d 14h | 1,271x slower | |
| $80.78 M | RandomX @ 81 MH/s | 513 KW | 1,470,913 confs | 2y 308d | 26,609x slower | |
| $72.12 M | Eaglesong @ 122 PH/s | 5.93 MW | 715,638 confs | 89d 21h | 2,303x slower | |
| $247,733 | RandomX @ 1.13 MH/s | 7.10 KW | 1,678,350 confs | 205y 312d | 1,925,224x slower | |
| $68,565 | KawPow @ 937 MH/s | 4.62 KW | 344,039,292 confs | 316y 136d | 2,958,820x slower |