
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.36 T | SHA-256 @ 1,072 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 58m 6s | - | |
| $14.01 B | Scrypt @ 3.11 PH/s | 653 MW | 1,245 confs | 21h 26m | 22x slower | |
| $9.02 B | SHA-256 @ 7.03 EH/s | 94 MW | 969 confs | 6d 3h | 153x slower | |
| $6.47 B | RandomX @ 5.63 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,668 confs | 16d 11h | 408x slower | |
| $4.15 B | Scrypt @ 3.06 PH/s | 643 MW | 538 confs | 21h 49m | 23x slower | |
| $3.49 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 40 MW | 16,427 confs | 14d 6h | 353x slower | |
| $1.28 B | Etchash @ 200 TH/s | 409 MW | 9,114 confs | 1d 10h | 35x slower | |
| $410.33 M | X11 @ 3.19 PH/s | 5.12 MW | 63,552 confs | 114d 16m | 2,826x slower | |
| $124.76 M | RandomX @ 171 MH/s | 1.08 MW | 790,126 confs | 1y 174d | 13,373x slower | |
| $88.70 M | KawPow @ 3.64 TH/s | 17 MW | 46,893 confs | 32d 13h | 807x slower | |
| $70.95 M | Eaglesong @ 144 PH/s | 6.99 MW | 635,685 confs | 83d 12h | 2,070x slower | |
| $271,036 | RandomX @ 2.00 MH/s | 12 KW | 1,199,181 confs | 127y 85d | 1,151,021x slower | |
| $126,620 | KawPow @ 2.53 GH/s | 12 KW | 135,136,484 confs | 128y 202d | 1,162,965x slower |