
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.54 T | SHA-256 @ 1,126 EH/s | 15 GW | 6 confs | 52m 6s | - | |
| $15.91 B | Scrypt @ 1.96 PH/s | 412 MW | 1,829 confs | 1d 8h | 37x slower | |
| $10.53 B | Equihash @ 17 GH/s | 59 MW | 10,730 confs | 9d 7h | 257x slower | |
| $7.15 B | SHA-256 @ 5.36 EH/s | 72 MW | 1,186 confs | 7d 14h | 210x slower | |
| $7.13 B | RandomX @ 5.46 GH/s | 34 MW | 11,342 confs | 16d 22m | 443x slower | |
| $4.13 B | Scrypt @ 3.13 PH/s | 657 MW | 509 confs | 20h 4m | 23x slower | |
| $1.42 B | Etchash @ 194 TH/s | 397 MW | 8,853 confs | 1d 9h | 38x slower | |
| $581.96 M | X11 @ 2.10 PH/s | 3.36 MW | 89,468 confs | 163d 14h | 4,522x slower | |
| $92.60 M | RandomX @ 74 MH/s | 472 KW | 1,705,832 confs | 3y 69d | 32,196x slower | |
| $90.06 M | KawPow @ 2.21 TH/s | 10 MW | 71,500 confs | 50d 11h | 1,395x slower | |
| $69.67 M | Eaglesong @ 110 PH/s | 5.34 MW | 883,631 confs | 102d 22h | 2,845x slower | |
| $213,137 | RandomX @ 682 KH/s | 4.30 KW | 1,885,517 confs | 350y 198d | 3,536,399x slower | |
| $45,616 | KawPow @ 581 MH/s | 2.86 KW | 553,455,294 confs | 526y 181d | 5,311,471x slower |