
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.48 T | SHA-256 @ 914 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 8m | - | |
| $16.93 B | Scrypt @ 3.03 PH/s | 636 MW | 1,259 confs | 22h 1m | 19x slower | |
| $9.40 B | SHA-256 @ 5.97 EH/s | 80 MW | 989 confs | 7d 5h | 153x slower | |
| $6.78 B | RandomX @ 5.71 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,690 confs | 16d 5h | 343x slower | |
| $4.52 B | Equihash @ 16 GH/s | 53 MW | 12,598 confs | 10d 22h | 231x slower | |
| $4.46 B | Scrypt @ 2.70 PH/s | 566 MW | 564 confs | 1d 45m | 22x slower | |
| $1.38 B | Etchash @ 193 TH/s | 395 MW | 9,388 confs | 1d 11h | 31x slower | |
| $444.08 M | X11 @ 3.12 PH/s | 5.01 MW | 64,148 confs | 116d 13h | 2,465x slower | |
| $121.91 M | RandomX @ 150 MH/s | 946 KW | 951,917 confs | 1y 251d | 13,046x slower | |
| $92.73 M | KawPow @ 4.24 TH/s | 20 MW | 40,976 confs | 27d 23h | 592x slower | |
| $78.24 M | Eaglesong @ 110 PH/s | 5.38 MW | 867,085 confs | 108d 14h | 2,296x slower | |
| $355,419 | RandomX @ 10 MH/s | 66 KW | 1,652,658 confs | 23y 327d | 184,438x slower | |
| $108,496 | KawPow @ 2.33 GH/s | 11 KW | 146,773,889 confs | 139y 228d | 1,077,635x slower |