
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.26 T | SHA-256 @ 877 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 8m | - | |
| $14.51 B | Scrypt @ 2.36 PH/s | 495 MW | 1,551 confs | 1d 3h | 24x slower | |
| $7.54 B | Equihash @ 18 GH/s | 61 MW | 10,505 confs | 9d 2h | 193x slower | |
| $5.84 B | RandomX @ 5.56 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,223 confs | 15d 23h | 338x slower | |
| $4.11 B | SHA-256 @ 3.14 EH/s | 42 MW | 1,612 confs | 13d 4h | 279x slower | |
| $3.28 B | Scrypt @ 2.87 PH/s | 602 MW | 532 confs | 22h 18m | 20x slower | |
| $1.10 B | Etchash @ 183 TH/s | 374 MW | 9,455 confs | 1d 11h | 32x slower | |
| $456.89 M | X11 @ 2.35 PH/s | 3.76 MW | 82,377 confs | 148d 17h | 3,150x slower | |
| $83.51 M | RandomX @ 79 MH/s | 502 KW | 1,577,525 confs | 3y 18d | 23,586x slower | |
| $69.33 M | KawPow @ 2.08 TH/s | 10 MW | 78,795 confs | 54d 17h | 1,159x slower | |
| $51.61 M | Eaglesong @ 81 PH/s | 3.96 MW | 1,236,151 confs | 141d 10h | 2,995x slower | |
| $139,196 | RandomX @ 3.15 MH/s | 19 KW | 3,672,715 confs | 77y 77d | 596,816x slower | |
| $55,489 | KawPow @ 608 MH/s | 3.00 KW | 537,562,727 confs | 511y 138d | 3,952,667x slower |