
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.62 T | SHA-256 @ 1,131 EH/s | 15 GW | 6 confs | 50m 18s | - | |
| $16.78 B | Scrypt @ 4.05 PH/s | 850 MW | 861 confs | 15h 4m | 18x slower | |
| $9.97 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 46 MW | 13,097 confs | 11d 8h | 325x slower | |
| $9.02 B | SHA-256 @ 5.02 EH/s | 67 MW | 1,079 confs | 7d 21h | 225x slower | |
| $7.54 B | RandomX @ 5.65 GH/s | 35 MW | 10,895 confs | 15d 8m | 430x slower | |
| $4.48 B | Scrypt @ 3.04 PH/s | 638 MW | 547 confs | 20h 3m | 24x slower | |
| $1.51 B | Etchash @ 192 TH/s | 393 MW | 8,726 confs | 1d 8h | 39x slower | |
| $622.80 M | X11 @ 2.82 PH/s | 4.52 MW | 64,946 confs | 118d 22m | 3,379x slower | |
| $101.45 M | KawPow @ 2.14 TH/s | 10 MW | 72,972 confs | 50d 16h | 1,451x slower | |
| $87.72 M | RandomX @ 76 MH/s | 481 KW | 1,569,636 confs | 3y 13d | 31,726x slower | |
| $79.58 M | Eaglesong @ 112 PH/s | 5.46 MW | 803,554 confs | 97d 17h | 2,798x slower | |
| $219,471 | RandomX @ 734 KH/s | 4.62 KW | 1,678,351 confs | 316y 7d | 3,302,201x slower | |
| $71,396 | KawPow @ 750 MH/s | 3.70 KW | 415,351,574 confs | 395y 44d | 4,128,743x slower |