
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.41 T | SHA-256 @ 973 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 1h 4m | - | |
| $14.44 B | Scrypt @ 3.31 PH/s | 694 MW | 1,154 confs | 20h 11m | 19x slower | |
| $9.52 B | SHA-256 @ 6.77 EH/s | 91 MW | 924 confs | 6d 9h | 144x slower | |
| $6.42 B | RandomX @ 6.37 GH/s | 40 MW | 10,756 confs | 14d 13h | 328x slower | |
| $4.33 B | Scrypt @ 2.72 PH/s | 571 MW | 585 confs | 1d 32m | 23x slower | |
| $3.88 B | Equihash @ 11 GH/s | 38 MW | 17,483 confs | 15d 4h | 341x slower | |
| $1.31 B | Etchash @ 196 TH/s | 402 MW | 9,289 confs | 1d 10h | 33x slower | |
| $404.97 M | X11 @ 2.81 PH/s | 4.51 MW | 71,693 confs | 129d 10h | 2,913x slower | |
| $114.41 M | RandomX @ 108 MH/s | 681 KW | 1,175,600 confs | 2y 127d | 19,287x slower | |
| $90.13 M | KawPow @ 3.64 TH/s | 17 MW | 46,900 confs | 32d 13h | 733x slower | |
| $72.49 M | Eaglesong @ 127 PH/s | 6.16 MW | 721,331 confs | 94d 19h | 2,133x slower | |
| $316,804 | RandomX @ 10 MH/s | 65 KW | 1,966,080 confs | 24y 182d | 201,216x slower | |
| $104,428 | KawPow @ 2.02 GH/s | 9.97 KW | 168,764,708 confs | 160y 198d | 1,318,474x slower |