
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.32 T | SHA-256 @ 1,063 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 58m 18s | - | |
| $15.60 B | Scrypt @ 4.36 PH/s | 915 MW | 871 confs | 15h 14m | 16x slower | |
| $8.84 B | SHA-256 @ 6.22 EH/s | 84 MW | 908 confs | 6d 22h | 171x slower | |
| $6.27 B | RandomX @ 5.66 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,742 confs | 16d 7h | 403x slower | |
| $4.11 B | Scrypt @ 2.93 PH/s | 615 MW | 523 confs | 22h 39m | 23x slower | |
| $3.56 B | Equihash @ 11 GH/s | 38 MW | 17,350 confs | 15d 1h | 372x slower | |
| $1.33 B | Etchash @ 209 TH/s | 429 MW | 8,700 confs | 1d 8h | 33x slower | |
| $404.53 M | X11 @ 2.34 PH/s | 3.75 MW | 85,253 confs | 154d 21h | 3,826x slower | |
| $115.24 M | RandomX @ 113 MH/s | 716 KW | 1,168,937 confs | 2y 81d | 20,050x slower | |
| $90.55 M | KawPow @ 3.39 TH/s | 16 MW | 50,085 confs | 34d 18h | 859x slower | |
| $73.43 M | Eaglesong @ 124 PH/s | 6.01 MW | 833,979 confs | 96d 16h | 2,388x slower | |
| $304,595 | RandomX @ 9.96 MH/s | 62 KW | 1,393,067 confs | 25y 145d | 228,992x slower | |
| $105,038 | KawPow @ 2.47 GH/s | 12 KW | 137,633,977 confs | 130y 339d | 1,180,394x slower |