
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.28 T | SHA-256 @ 932 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 4m | - | |
| $13.31 B | Scrypt @ 2.62 PH/s | 551 MW | 1,393 confs | 1d 22m | 23x slower | |
| $7.32 B | RandomX @ 5.34 GH/s | 33 MW | 11,782 confs | 16d 15h | 374x slower | |
| $7.17 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 49 MW | 12,949 confs | 11d 9h | 256x slower | |
| $4.11 B | SHA-256 @ 3.22 EH/s | 43 MW | 1,745 confs | 12d 20h | 289x slower | |
| $3.30 B | Scrypt @ 2.77 PH/s | 580 MW | 545 confs | 23h 9m | 22x slower | |
| $1.14 B | Etchash @ 205 TH/s | 421 MW | 8,782 confs | 1d 7h | 30x slower | |
| $452.78 M | X11 @ 3.58 PH/s | 5.75 MW | 54,254 confs | 97d 7h | 2,190x slower | |
| $80.78 M | RandomX @ 56 MH/s | 356 KW | 2,151,557 confs | 4y 108d | 35,299x slower | |
| $70.03 M | KawPow @ 1.96 TH/s | 9.67 MW | 83,300 confs | 57d 20h | 1,302x slower | |
| $55.00 M | Eaglesong @ 64 PH/s | 3.15 MW | 1,430,936 confs | 177d 15h | 3,997x slower | |
| $141,909 | RandomX @ 2.07 MH/s | 13 KW | 4,282,731 confs | 117y 221d | 965,845x slower | |
| $55,143 | KawPow @ 940 MH/s | 4.63 KW | 348,029,710 confs | 331y 28d | 2,718,982x slower |