
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.49 T | SHA-256 @ 1,126 EH/s | 15 GW | 6 confs | 53m | - | |
| $14.36 B | Scrypt @ 2.80 PH/s | 587 MW | 1,308 confs | 22h 53m | 26x slower | |
| $8.76 B | SHA-256 @ 5.78 EH/s | 78 MW | 1,006 confs | 7d 4h | 195x slower | |
| $6.37 B | RandomX @ 5.23 GH/s | 32 MW | 11,931 confs | 16d 23h | 461x slower | |
| $5.98 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 46 MW | 13,883 confs | 12d 1h | 327x slower | |
| $4.19 B | Scrypt @ 2.77 PH/s | 581 MW | 554 confs | 23h 5m | 26x slower | |
| $1.30 B | Etchash @ 206 TH/s | 422 MW | 8,480 confs | 1d 7h | 36x slower | |
| $487.36 M | X11 @ 2.23 PH/s | 3.58 MW | 85,434 confs | 156d 5h | 4,245x slower | |
| $115.06 M | RandomX @ 112 MH/s | 706 KW | 1,160,231 confs | 2y 62d | 21,526x slower | |
| $91.30 M | KawPow @ 3.03 TH/s | 14 MW | 54,836 confs | 37d 10h | 1,017x slower | |
| $71.80 M | Eaglesong @ 138 PH/s | 6.70 MW | 611,982 confs | 83d 13h | 2,270x slower | |
| $227,499 | RandomX @ 8.50 MH/s | 53 KW | 1,760,636 confs | 28y 233d | 284,027x slower | |
| $88,142 | KawPow @ 1.95 GH/s | 9.61 KW | 167,713,596 confs | 159y 198d | 1,582,204x slower |