
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.28 T | SHA-256 @ 817 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 13m | - | |
| $14.73 B | Scrypt @ 2.02 PH/s | 424 MW | 1,780 confs | 1d 7h | 26x slower | |
| $7.36 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 46 MW | 13,804 confs | 11d 23h | 236x slower | |
| $5.65 B | RandomX @ 6.11 GH/s | 38 MW | 11,129 confs | 14d 13h | 287x slower | |
| $4.62 B | SHA-256 @ 3.61 EH/s | 48 MW | 1,533 confs | 11d 11h | 226x slower | |
| $3.33 B | Scrypt @ 2.87 PH/s | 602 MW | 532 confs | 22h 18m | 18x slower | |
| $1.12 B | Etchash @ 199 TH/s | 408 MW | 8,884 confs | 1d 8h | 27x slower | |
| $471.76 M | X11 @ 2.43 PH/s | 3.89 MW | 79,601 confs | 143d 17h | 2,835x slower | |
| $85.85 M | RandomX @ 87 MH/s | 553 KW | 1,479,830 confs | 2y 280d | 19,934x slower | |
| $70.04 M | KawPow @ 2.21 TH/s | 10 MW | 73,896 confs | 51d 7h | 1,012x slower | |
| $52.73 M | Eaglesong @ 116 PH/s | 5.66 MW | 875,754 confs | 98d 19h | 1,949x slower | |
| $155,991 | RandomX @ 857 KH/s | 5.40 KW | 11,884,907 confs | 283y 285d | 2,043,227x slower | |
| $49,823 | KawPow @ 400 MH/s | 1.97 KW | 816,243,197 confs | 776y 177d | 5,590,707x slower |