
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.42 T | SHA-256 @ 1,147 EH/s | 15 GW | 6 confs | 54m 18s | - | |
| $15.95 B | Scrypt @ 2.85 PH/s | 598 MW | 1,340 confs | 23h 27m | 26x slower | |
| $9.54 B | SHA-256 @ 6.34 EH/s | 85 MW | 971 confs | 6d 19h | 181x slower | |
| $6.46 B | RandomX @ 6.13 GH/s | 38 MW | 11,168 confs | 15d 2h | 401x slower | |
| $4.28 B | Scrypt @ 2.64 PH/s | 554 MW | 580 confs | 1d 1h | 28x slower | |
| $3.80 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 42 MW | 15,935 confs | 13d 19h | 367x slower | |
| $1.34 B | Etchash @ 201 TH/s | 413 MW | 8,988 confs | 1d 9h | 37x slower | |
| $435.49 M | X11 @ 1.82 PH/s | 2.92 MW | 110,161 confs | 200d 4h | 5,309x slower | |
| $111.50 M | RandomX @ 90 MH/s | 570 KW | 1,320,294 confs | 2y 293d | 27,152x slower | |
| $92.27 M | KawPow @ 3.24 TH/s | 15 MW | 52,686 confs | 36d 14h | 970x slower | |
| $69.76 M | Eaglesong @ 128 PH/s | 6.24 MW | 748,185 confs | 93d 13h | 2,481x slower | |
| $300,015 | RandomX @ 2.12 MH/s | 13 KW | 1,546,876 confs | 119y 321d | 1,160,394x slower | |
| $103,296 | KawPow @ 2.27 GH/s | 11 KW | 150,443,741 confs | 143y 42d | 1,385,301x slower |