
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.42 T | SHA-256 @ 1,008 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 1h 1m | - | |
| $16.13 B | Scrypt @ 3.27 PH/s | 686 MW | 1,186 confs | 20h 25m | 20x slower | |
| $9.13 B | SHA-256 @ 6.75 EH/s | 91 MW | 974 confs | 6d 9h | 149x slower | |
| $6.38 B | RandomX @ 6.42 GH/s | 40 MW | 10,854 confs | 14d 10h | 337x slower | |
| $4.31 B | Scrypt @ 2.72 PH/s | 571 MW | 585 confs | 1d 32m | 24x slower | |
| $4.16 B | Equihash @ 11 GH/s | 38 MW | 17,025 confs | 14d 23h | 349x slower | |
| $1.33 B | Etchash @ 205 TH/s | 421 MW | 9,000 confs | 1d 9h | 32x slower | |
| $412.88 M | X11 @ 2.58 PH/s | 4.14 MW | 77,151 confs | 141d 2h | 3,287x slower | |
| $115.29 M | RandomX @ 116 MH/s | 732 KW | 1,129,780 confs | 2y 67d | 18,586x slower | |
| $89.06 M | KawPow @ 3.33 TH/s | 16 MW | 50,510 confs | 35d 15h | 831x slower | |
| $73.01 M | Eaglesong @ 118 PH/s | 5.74 MW | 761,363 confs | 101d 17h | 2,370x slower | |
| $326,282 | RandomX @ 3.70 MH/s | 23 KW | 1,652,659 confs | 68y 218d | 583,422x slower | |
| $104,370 | KawPow @ 2.87 GH/s | 14 KW | 119,034,319 confs | 113y 86d | 963,061x slower |