
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.63 T | SHA-256 @ 932 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 1m | - | |
| $19.04 B | Scrypt @ 2.35 PH/s | 494 MW | 1,458 confs | 1d 1h | 25x slower | |
| $9.31 B | SHA-256 @ 6.08 EH/s | 82 MW | 1,024 confs | 6d 11h | 153x slower | |
| $9.17 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 43 MW | 14,066 confs | 12d 5h | 288x slower | |
| $7.63 B | RandomX @ 6.03 GH/s | 37 MW | 10,206 confs | 14d 1h | 332x slower | |
| $4.37 B | Scrypt @ 2.42 PH/s | 508 MW | 547 confs | 1d 1h | 25x slower | |
| $1.46 B | Etchash @ 199 TH/s | 408 MW | 8,449 confs | 1d 7h | 31x slower | |
| $657.08 M | X11 @ 3.19 PH/s | 5.12 MW | 56,606 confs | 104d 4h | 2,459x slower | |
| $98.53 M | KawPow @ 1.62 TH/s | 8.00 MW | 94,487 confs | 66d 17h | 1,575x slower | |
| $92.57 M | RandomX @ 99 MH/s | 624 KW | 1,251,715 confs | 2y 124d | 20,178x slower | |
| $76.24 M | Eaglesong @ 169 PH/s | 8.22 MW | 530,592 confs | 64d 20h | 1,531x slower | |
| $232,279 | RandomX @ 567 KH/s | 3.57 KW | 1,678,351 confs | 409y 96d | 3,526,369x slower | |
| $61,898 | KawPow @ 808 MH/s | 3.98 KW | 385,708,537 confs | 366y 336d | 3,161,545x slower |