
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.43 T | SHA-256 @ 998 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 59m 48s | - | |
| $14.17 B | Scrypt @ 3.21 PH/s | 674 MW | 1,139 confs | 19h 55m | 20x slower | |
| $8.86 B | SHA-256 @ 5.77 EH/s | 77 MW | 977 confs | 7d 4h | 173x slower | |
| $6.36 B | RandomX @ 6.71 GH/s | 42 MW | 10,407 confs | 13d 5h | 319x slower | |
| $6.06 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 47 MW | 13,756 confs | 11d 18h | 284x slower | |
| $4.19 B | Scrypt @ 2.66 PH/s | 557 MW | 571 confs | 1d 6m | 24x slower | |
| $1.31 B | Etchash @ 208 TH/s | 427 MW | 8,457 confs | 1d 7h | 32x slower | |
| $451.33 M | X11 @ 2.70 PH/s | 4.34 MW | 71,435 confs | 128d 23h | 3,106x slower | |
| $112.96 M | RandomX @ 100 MH/s | 629 KW | 1,279,564 confs | 2y 158d | 21,397x slower | |
| $92.12 M | KawPow @ 2.89 TH/s | 14 MW | 56,658 confs | 39d 8h | 947x slower | |
| $70.06 M | Eaglesong @ 82 PH/s | 4.01 MW | 968,513 confs | 139d 10h | 3,358x slower | |
| $240,185 | RandomX @ 761 KH/s | 4.79 KW | 1,304,192 confs | 319y 263d | 2,810,119x slower | |
| $88,998 | KawPow @ 2.26 GH/s | 11 KW | 149,503,852 confs | 137y 175d | 1,208,364x slower |