
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.55 T | SHA-256 @ 1,012 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 57m 30s | - | |
| $15.14 B | Scrypt @ 2.56 PH/s | 537 MW | 1,371 confs | 1d 22m | 25x slower | |
| $9.12 B | SHA-256 @ 5.72 EH/s | 77 MW | 999 confs | 7d 1h | 177x slower | |
| $6.80 B | RandomX @ 5.65 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,336 confs | 15d 8h | 384x slower | |
| $5.94 B | Equihash @ 11 GH/s | 39 MW | 15,961 confs | 13d 20h | 347x slower | |
| $4.35 B | Scrypt @ 2.52 PH/s | 528 MW | 569 confs | 1d 48m | 26x slower | |
| $1.33 B | Etchash @ 200 TH/s | 409 MW | 8,510 confs | 1d 7h | 33x slower | |
| $463.51 M | X11 @ 2.34 PH/s | 3.75 MW | 80,156 confs | 145d 15h | 3,648x slower | |
| $107.69 M | RandomX @ 85 MH/s | 536 KW | 1,489,817 confs | 2y 287d | 25,478x slower | |
| $100.64 M | KawPow @ 2.52 TH/s | 12 MW | 63,315 confs | 43d 23h | 1,101x slower | |
| $73.69 M | Eaglesong @ 164 PH/s | 7.99 MW | 558,697 confs | 68d 8h | 1,711x slower | |
| $288,312 | RandomX @ 833 KH/s | 5.25 KW | 1,717,916 confs | 285y 64d | 2,606,749x slower | |
| $58,448 | KawPow @ 1.01 GH/s | 4.96 KW | 317,069,321 confs | 301y 228d | 2,757,125x slower |