
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.55 T | SHA-256 @ 969 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 1h 30s | - | |
| $16.54 B | Scrypt @ 3.53 PH/s | 740 MW | 1,019 confs | 17h 49m | 18x slower | |
| $8.89 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 41 MW | 15,153 confs | 13d 3h | 313x slower | |
| $8.07 B | SHA-256 @ 5.21 EH/s | 70 MW | 1,114 confs | 7d 19h | 186x slower | |
| $7.13 B | RandomX @ 6.63 GH/s | 41 MW | 9,573 confs | 13d 4h | 314x slower | |
| $4.20 B | Scrypt @ 3.04 PH/s | 638 MW | 528 confs | 20h 40m | 21x slower | |
| $1.39 B | Etchash @ 188 TH/s | 386 MW | 9,108 confs | 1d 10h | 34x slower | |
| $513.55 M | X11 @ 1.83 PH/s | 2.94 MW | 102,361 confs | 187d 4h | 4,455x slower | |
| $89.43 M | KawPow @ 2.61 TH/s | 12 MW | 61,688 confs | 42d 20h | 1,020x slower | |
| $84.78 M | RandomX @ 72 MH/s | 455 KW | 1,737,759 confs | 3y 111d | 28,723x slower | |
| $69.76 M | Eaglesong @ 120 PH/s | 5.84 MW | 907,955 confs | 94d 4h | 2,241x slower | |
| $215,444 | RandomX @ 1.89 MH/s | 11 KW | 4,687,137 confs | 126y 230d | 1,100,121x slower | |
| $62,845 | KawPow @ 734 MH/s | 3.62 KW | 437,607,795 confs | 416y 107d | 3,616,593x slower |