
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.18 T | SHA-256 @ 860 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 6m | - | |
| $11.21 B | Scrypt @ 1.80 PH/s | 378 MW | 1,953 confs | 1d 10h | 31x slower | |
| $6.21 B | Equihash @ 20 GH/s | 67 MW | 9,200 confs | 7d 23h | 172x slower | |
| $5.78 B | RandomX @ 5.55 GH/s | 34 MW | 10,827 confs | 15d 9h | 332x slower | |
| $3.78 B | SHA-256 @ 3.96 EH/s | 53 MW | 1,621 confs | 10d 2h | 217x slower | |
| $3.29 B | Scrypt @ 2.52 PH/s | 528 MW | 569 confs | 1d 29m | 22x slower | |
| $1.10 B | Etchash @ 193 TH/s | 396 MW | 8,794 confs | 1d 8h | 29x slower | |
| $404.86 M | X11 @ 3.90 PH/s | 6.26 MW | 47,727 confs | 86d 4h | 1,858x slower | |
| $69.64 M | RandomX @ 68 MH/s | 432 KW | 1,795,179 confs | 3y 151d | 26,874x slower | |
| $64.02 M | KawPow @ 1.78 TH/s | 8.79 MW | 89,826 confs | 61d 8h | 1,322x slower | |
| $44.82 M | Eaglesong @ 74 PH/s | 3.63 MW | 1,394,553 confs | 148d 13h | 3,203x slower | |
| $99,285 | RandomX @ 1.95 MH/s | 12 KW | 5,870,768 confs | 120y 162d | 947,701x slower | |
| $57,432 | KawPow @ 759 MH/s | 3.74 KW | 414,769,998 confs | 394y 207d | 3,104,566x slower |