
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.41 T | SHA-256 @ 993 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 1h 2m | - | |
| $15.72 B | Scrypt @ 2.60 PH/s | 545 MW | 1,468 confs | 1d 1h | 25x slower | |
| $9.12 B | SHA-256 @ 7.20 EH/s | 97 MW | 935 confs | 6d 8m | 138x slower | |
| $6.50 B | RandomX @ 5.91 GH/s | 37 MW | 11,215 confs | 15d 16h | 361x slower | |
| $4.23 B | Scrypt @ 2.82 PH/s | 592 MW | 520 confs | 23h 41m | 23x slower | |
| $3.52 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 42 MW | 15,737 confs | 13d 15h | 314x slower | |
| $1.29 B | Etchash @ 202 TH/s | 415 MW | 9,026 confs | 1d 9h | 32x slower | |
| $413.49 M | X11 @ 1.82 PH/s | 2.92 MW | 109,898 confs | 199d 16h | 4,586x slower | |
| $121.61 M | RandomX @ 122 MH/s | 769 KW | 1,111,177 confs | 2y 28d | 17,427x slower | |
| $89.35 M | KawPow @ 3.71 TH/s | 18 MW | 46,814 confs | 31d 23h | 734x slower | |
| $74.98 M | Eaglesong @ 75 PH/s | 3.68 MW | 1,189,495 confs | 158d 13h | 3,641x slower | |
| $266,018 | RandomX @ 6.39 MH/s | 40 KW | 3,308,084 confs | 39y 276d | 333,271x slower | |
| $110,449 | KawPow @ 2.14 GH/s | 10 KW | 159,501,218 confs | 151y 267d | 1,271,940x slower |