
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.43 T | SHA-256 @ 932 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 4m | - | |
| $17.17 B | Scrypt @ 3.44 PH/s | 722 MW | 1,062 confs | 18h 35m | 17x slower | |
| $9.15 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 45 MW | 14,220 confs | 12d 8h | 278x slower | |
| $6.28 B | RandomX @ 5.96 GH/s | 37 MW | 11,108 confs | 14d 21h | 336x slower | |
| $5.84 B | SHA-256 @ 3.88 EH/s | 52 MW | 1,430 confs | 10d 16h | 240x slower | |
| $3.92 B | Scrypt @ 2.80 PH/s | 588 MW | 524 confs | 22h 51m | 21x slower | |
| $1.26 B | Etchash @ 184 TH/s | 377 MW | 9,384 confs | 1d 11h | 33x slower | |
| $505.90 M | X11 @ 3.15 PH/s | 5.05 MW | 61,358 confs | 110d 18h | 2,493x slower | |
| $87.59 M | RandomX @ 79 MH/s | 500 KW | 1,637,077 confs | 3y 22d | 25,153x slower | |
| $84.18 M | KawPow @ 2.34 TH/s | 11 MW | 70,020 confs | 48d 15h | 1,094x slower | |
| $63.49 M | Eaglesong @ 99 PH/s | 4.82 MW | 1,116,920 confs | 116d 43m | 2,611x slower | |
| $204,550 | RandomX @ 257 KH/s | 1.62 KW | 7,671,712 confs | 944y 45d | 7,753,623x slower | |
| $57,045 | KawPow @ 486 MH/s | 2.40 KW | 672,466,953 confs | 639y 260d | 5,253,648x slower |