
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.20 T | SHA-256 @ 1,054 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 50m 54s | - | |
| $11.60 B | Scrypt @ 2.09 PH/s | 438 MW | 1,601 confs | 1d 3h | 32x slower | |
| $6.97 B | Equihash @ 21 GH/s | 71 MW | 8,229 confs | 7d 1h | 199x slower | |
| $5.80 B | RandomX @ 5.61 GH/s | 35 MW | 10,617 confs | 14d 6h | 403x slower | |
| $3.89 B | SHA-256 @ 2.68 EH/s | 36 MW | 1,716 confs | 13d 22h | 394x slower | |
| $3.17 B | Scrypt @ 2.69 PH/s | 564 MW | 507 confs | 21h 24m | 25x slower | |
| $1.11 B | Etchash @ 191 TH/s | 392 MW | 8,176 confs | 1d 6h | 36x slower | |
| $433.22 M | X11 @ 2.90 PH/s | 4.65 MW | 59,928 confs | 108d 4h | 3,061x slower | |
| $77.24 M | RandomX @ 76 MH/s | 484 KW | 1,495,793 confs | 2y 308d | 29,387x slower | |
| $61.73 M | KawPow @ 1.65 TH/s | 8.14 MW | 89,030 confs | 61d 19h | 1,749x slower | |
| $45.88 M | Eaglesong @ 84 PH/s | 4.08 MW | 1,245,071 confs | 123d 8h | 3,489x slower | |
| $111,095 | RandomX @ 1.10 MH/s | 6.93 KW | 4,428,583 confs | 198y 309d | 2,053,331x slower | |
| $60,165 | KawPow @ 446 MH/s | 2.20 KW | 681,734,460 confs | 626y 332d | 6,473,575x slower |