
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.55 T | SHA-256 @ 954 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 1m | - | |
| $16.21 B | Scrypt @ 2.34 PH/s | 491 MW | 1,535 confs | 1d 2h | 26x slower | |
| $9.47 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 46 MW | 13,573 confs | 11d 18h | 276x slower | |
| $7.60 B | SHA-256 @ 4.59 EH/s | 62 MW | 1,151 confs | 8d 20h | 208x slower | |
| $7.10 B | RandomX @ 6.94 GH/s | 43 MW | 9,145 confs | 12d 14h | 295x slower | |
| $4.20 B | Scrypt @ 2.94 PH/s | 616 MW | 528 confs | 21h 24m | 21x slower | |
| $1.41 B | Etchash @ 193 TH/s | 396 MW | 8,885 confs | 1d 9h | 32x slower | |
| $545.97 M | X11 @ 1.69 PH/s | 2.72 MW | 111,481 confs | 202d 13h | 4,743x slower | |
| $91.08 M | KawPow @ 2.24 TH/s | 11 MW | 70,478 confs | 49d 18h | 1,165x slower | |
| $86.78 M | RandomX @ 80 MH/s | 509 KW | 1,609,196 confs | 2y 350d | 25,294x slower | |
| $71.23 M | Eaglesong @ 149 PH/s | 7.25 MW | 738,943 confs | 75d 21h | 1,777x slower | |
| $217,730 | RandomX @ 6.03 MH/s | 37 KW | 2,891,509 confs | 39y 256d | 339,302x slower | |
| $50,620 | KawPow @ 516 MH/s | 2.54 KW | 622,988,781 confs | 592y 235d | 5,064,949x slower |