
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.61 T | SHA-256 @ 999 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 56m 54s | - | |
| $18.62 B | Scrypt @ 3.07 PH/s | 645 MW | 1,135 confs | 19h 51m | 21x slower | |
| $10.22 B | Equihash @ 15 GH/s | 52 MW | 11,847 confs | 10d 3h | 257x slower | |
| $9.06 B | SHA-256 @ 4.89 EH/s | 66 MW | 1,068 confs | 8d 2h | 204x slower | |
| $7.44 B | RandomX @ 5.63 GH/s | 35 MW | 10,844 confs | 15d 1h | 381x slower | |
| $4.52 B | Scrypt @ 2.87 PH/s | 602 MW | 547 confs | 21h 16m | 22x slower | |
| $1.53 B | Etchash @ 189 TH/s | 388 MW | 8,759 confs | 1d 8h | 35x slower | |
| $632.41 M | X11 @ 2.61 PH/s | 4.18 MW | 69,708 confs | 127d 11h | 3,226x slower | |
| $102.75 M | KawPow @ 2.32 TH/s | 11 MW | 68,319 confs | 46d 15h | 1,181x slower | |
| $88.83 M | RandomX @ 88 MH/s | 555 KW | 1,383,464 confs | 2y 230d | 24,314x slower | |
| $80.99 M | Eaglesong @ 111 PH/s | 5.43 MW | 899,084 confs | 98d 5h | 2,486x slower | |
| $233,819 | RandomX @ 479 KH/s | 3.02 KW | 1,678,351 confs | 483y 203d | 4,466,751x slower | |
| $73,448 | KawPow @ 965 MH/s | 4.75 KW | 334,227,751 confs | 307y 127d | 2,839,076x slower |