
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.23 T | SHA-256 @ 932 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 4m | - | |
| $12.77 B | Scrypt @ 3.42 PH/s | 718 MW | 1,069 confs | 18h 42m | 18x slower | |
| $6.49 B | Equihash @ 23 GH/s | 76 MW | 8,572 confs | 7d 8h | 165x slower | |
| $5.75 B | RandomX @ 5.09 GH/s | 32 MW | 11,594 confs | 17d 10h | 392x slower | |
| $4.25 B | SHA-256 @ 3.63 EH/s | 49 MW | 1,483 confs | 11d 9h | 257x slower | |
| $3.38 B | Scrypt @ 2.93 PH/s | 614 MW | 547 confs | 21h 52m | 20x slower | |
| $1.08 B | Etchash @ 186 TH/s | 382 MW | 9,355 confs | 1d 11h | 33x slower | |
| $402.58 M | X11 @ 4.58 PH/s | 7.34 MW | 42,472 confs | 76d 4h | 1,714x slower | |
| $82.90 M | RandomX @ 79 MH/s | 503 KW | 1,656,299 confs | 3y 16d | 25,017x slower | |
| $69.23 M | KawPow @ 2.06 TH/s | 10 MW | 79,363 confs | 55d 2h | 1,240x slower | |
| $51.74 M | Eaglesong @ 98 PH/s | 4.79 MW | 1,067,937 confs | 116d 21h | 2,631x slower | |
| $142,034 | RandomX @ 711 KH/s | 4.48 KW | 2,971,230 confs | 342y 2d | 2,808,741x slower | |
| $44,500 | KawPow @ 611 MH/s | 3.01 KW | 553,566,272 confs | 509y 18d | 4,180,579x slower |