
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.60 T | SHA-256 @ 979 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 58m 6s | - | |
| $18.71 B | Scrypt @ 2.48 PH/s | 520 MW | 1,405 confs | 1d 35m | 25x slower | |
| $8.89 B | SHA-256 @ 5.19 EH/s | 70 MW | 1,068 confs | 7d 14h | 189x slower | |
| $7.46 B | RandomX @ 5.94 GH/s | 37 MW | 10,189 confs | 14d 6h | 354x slower | |
| $7.00 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 42 MW | 14,530 confs | 12d 14h | 313x slower | |
| $4.24 B | Scrypt @ 2.82 PH/s | 591 MW | 490 confs | 21h 38m | 22x slower | |
| $1.36 B | Etchash @ 194 TH/s | 398 MW | 8,576 confs | 1d 8h | 33x slower | |
| $602.44 M | X11 @ 2.47 PH/s | 3.96 MW | 74,190 confs | 134d 19h | 3,341x slower | |
| $96.03 M | KawPow @ 2.07 TH/s | 10 MW | 75,336 confs | 52d 7h | 1,297x slower | |
| $90.07 M | RandomX @ 85 MH/s | 537 KW | 1,454,194 confs | 2y 263d | 24,612x slower | |
| $72.76 M | Eaglesong @ 140 PH/s | 6.84 MW | 670,954 confs | 78d 23m | 1,934x slower | |
| $234,079 | RandomX @ 367 KH/s | 2.31 KW | 1,678,353 confs | 631y 108d | 5,711,019x slower | |
| $72,703 | KawPow @ 1.06 GH/s | 5.22 KW | 304,504,724 confs | 280y 6d | 2,533,172x slower |