
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.36 T | SHA-256 @ 1,173 EH/s | 15 GW | 6 confs | 53m 6s | - | |
| $13.88 B | Scrypt @ 2.75 PH/s | 577 MW | 1,410 confs | 1d 17m | 27x slower | |
| $9.32 B | SHA-256 @ 6.90 EH/s | 93 MW | 966 confs | 6d 6h | 170x slower | |
| $6.66 B | RandomX @ 5.70 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,517 confs | 16d 6h | 441x slower | |
| $4.13 B | Scrypt @ 2.66 PH/s | 558 MW | 580 confs | 1d 1h | 28x slower | |
| $3.62 B | Equihash @ 17 GH/s | 56 MW | 11,967 confs | 10d 5h | 278x slower | |
| $1.26 B | Etchash @ 210 TH/s | 431 MW | 8,693 confs | 1d 8h | 37x slower | |
| $410.33 M | X11 @ 2.50 PH/s | 4.01 MW | 80,122 confs | 145d 14h | 3,948x slower | |
| $110.73 M | RandomX @ 186 MH/s | 1.17 MW | 741,398 confs | 1y 132d | 13,497x slower | |
| $87.43 M | KawPow @ 3.43 TH/s | 16 MW | 49,792 confs | 34d 13h | 938x slower | |
| $67.77 M | Eaglesong @ 80 PH/s | 3.91 MW | 1,126,365 confs | 149d 12h | 4,055x slower | |
| $294,460 | RandomX @ 3.09 MH/s | 19 KW | 1,546,876 confs | 82y 58d | 813,251x slower | |
| $104,442 | KawPow @ 2.20 GH/s | 10 KW | 155,015,417 confs | 147y 169d | 1,459,656x slower |