
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.57 T | SHA-256 @ 1,055 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 55m 12s | - | |
| $18.46 B | Scrypt @ 2.84 PH/s | 595 MW | 1,238 confs | 22h 32s | 24x slower | |
| $9.06 B | SHA-256 @ 6.08 EH/s | 82 MW | 978 confs | 6d 15h | 174x slower | |
| $6.96 B | RandomX @ 5.00 GH/s | 31 MW | 12,096 confs | 17d 8h | 453x slower | |
| $6.37 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 44 MW | 14,267 confs | 12d 9h | 323x slower | |
| $4.27 B | Scrypt @ 2.88 PH/s | 604 MW | 558 confs | 21h 42m | 24x slower | |
| $1.32 B | Etchash @ 189 TH/s | 387 MW | 8,952 confs | 1d 9h | 37x slower | |
| $473.87 M | X11 @ 4.12 PH/s | 6.61 MW | 45,755 confs | 82d 14h | 2,155x slower | |
| $94.71 M | KawPow @ 1.79 TH/s | 8.83 MW | 87,612 confs | 61d 20h | 1,614x slower | |
| $94.00 M | RandomX @ 73 MH/s | 460 KW | 1,680,285 confs | 3y 91d | 30,947x slower | |
| $72.79 M | Eaglesong @ 108 PH/s | 5.28 MW | 799,833 confs | 103d 8h | 2,696x slower | |
| $252,679 | RandomX @ 1.52 MH/s | 9.57 KW | 6,871,661 confs | 156y 85d | 1,487,615x slower | |
| $76,755 | KawPow @ 1.04 GH/s | 5.12 KW | 317,630,092 confs | 292y 31d | 2,781,181x slower |