
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.42 T | SHA-256 @ 922 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 7m | - | |
| $14.71 B | Scrypt @ 2.76 PH/s | 579 MW | 1,382 confs | 1d 11m | 21x slower | |
| $9.36 B | SHA-256 @ 7.35 EH/s | 99 MW | 919 confs | 5d 21h | 126x slower | |
| $6.56 B | RandomX @ 6.71 GH/s | 42 MW | 10,476 confs | 13d 19h | 295x slower | |
| $4.22 B | Scrypt @ 2.86 PH/s | 599 MW | 520 confs | 23h 24m | 21x slower | |
| $3.53 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 42 MW | 15,801 confs | 13d 17h | 293x slower | |
| $1.29 B | Etchash @ 204 TH/s | 419 MW | 8,872 confs | 1d 9h | 30x slower | |
| $410.78 M | X11 @ 2.20 PH/s | 3.54 MW | 90,898 confs | 165d 4h | 3,524x slower | |
| $111.36 M | RandomX @ 93 MH/s | 587 KW | 1,321,390 confs | 2y 264d | 21,207x slower | |
| $86.96 M | KawPow @ 3.51 TH/s | 17 MW | 48,666 confs | 33d 19h | 721x slower | |
| $73.89 M | Eaglesong @ 92 PH/s | 4.51 MW | 1,007,981 confs | 129d 13h | 2,764x slower | |
| $262,713 | RandomX @ 3.99 MH/s | 25 KW | 3,012,886 confs | 63y 229d | 495,452x slower | |
| $101,115 | KawPow @ 3.01 GH/s | 14 KW | 117,311,143 confs | 107y 320d | 840,006x slower |