
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.36 T | SHA-256 @ 1,095 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 56m 36s | - | |
| $16.42 B | Scrypt @ 3.32 PH/s | 696 MW | 1,146 confs | 20h 3m | 21x slower | |
| $11.45 B | SHA-256 @ 9.51 EH/s | 128 MW | 721 confs | 4d 12h | 115x slower | |
| $5.99 B | RandomX @ 5.96 GH/s | 37 MW | 11,349 confs | 15d 11h | 394x slower | |
| $4.20 B | Scrypt @ 2.92 PH/s | 612 MW | 536 confs | 22h 46m | 24x slower | |
| $4.16 B | Equihash @ 15 GH/s | 52 MW | 12,789 confs | 11d 2h | 282x slower | |
| $1.37 B | Etchash @ 212 TH/s | 435 MW | 8,575 confs | 1d 8h | 34x slower | |
| $428.46 M | X11 @ 2.90 PH/s | 4.65 MW | 68,425 confs | 125d 3h | 3,183x slower | |
| $111.15 M | RandomX @ 126 MH/s | 796 KW | 1,069,595 confs | 2y 9h | 18,582x slower | |
| $96.27 M | KawPow @ 4.17 TH/s | 20 MW | 40,779 confs | 28d 7h | 720x slower | |
| $75.68 M | Eaglesong @ 121 PH/s | 5.89 MW | 760,866 confs | 98d 18h | 2,513x slower | |
| $251,805 | RandomX @ 6.10 MH/s | 38 KW | 1,710,835 confs | 41y 183d | 385,391x slower | |
| $120,898 | KawPow @ 2.73 GH/s | 13 KW | 124,682,171 confs | 118y 222d | 1,101,433x slower |