
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.23 T | SHA-256 @ 858 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 9m | - | |
| $13.08 B | Scrypt @ 2.30 PH/s | 482 MW | 1,591 confs | 1d 3h | 24x slower | |
| $7.14 B | Equihash @ 18 GH/s | 62 MW | 10,303 confs | 8d 22h | 185x slower | |
| $5.81 B | RandomX @ 6.52 GH/s | 41 MW | 10,159 confs | 13d 15h | 283x slower | |
| $4.04 B | SHA-256 @ 3.28 EH/s | 44 MW | 1,663 confs | 12d 15h | 261x slower | |
| $3.32 B | Scrypt @ 2.72 PH/s | 571 MW | 532 confs | 23h 29m | 20x slower | |
| $1.10 B | Etchash @ 175 TH/s | 358 MW | 9,891 confs | 1d 13h | 32x slower | |
| $448.40 M | X11 @ 2.34 PH/s | 3.76 MW | 82,408 confs | 148d 19h | 3,083x slower | |
| $82.54 M | RandomX @ 87 MH/s | 548 KW | 1,492,481 confs | 2y 289d | 21,117x slower | |
| $68.90 M | KawPow @ 1.79 TH/s | 8.84 MW | 91,154 confs | 63d 7h | 1,312x slower | |
| $51.71 M | Eaglesong @ 77 PH/s | 3.76 MW | 1,209,046 confs | 148d 17h | 3,082x slower | |
| $141,081 | RandomX @ 1.63 MH/s | 10 KW | 3,672,716 confs | 149y 110d | 1,129,118x slower | |
| $55,893 | KawPow @ 746 MH/s | 3.68 KW | 438,174,898 confs | 416y 304d | 3,152,337x slower |