
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.35 T | SHA-256 @ 946 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 5m | - | |
| $13.81 B | Scrypt @ 3.95 PH/s | 829 MW | 966 confs | 16h 54m | 15x slower | |
| $9.02 B | SHA-256 @ 6.27 EH/s | 84 MW | 979 confs | 6d 21h | 151x slower | |
| $6.34 B | RandomX @ 5.74 GH/s | 36 MW | 11,842 confs | 16d 4h | 354x slower | |
| $4.13 B | Scrypt @ 2.99 PH/s | 627 MW | 529 confs | 22h 20m | 20x slower | |
| $3.28 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 47 MW | 14,362 confs | 12d 7h | 269x slower | |
| $1.27 B | Etchash @ 202 TH/s | 414 MW | 9,031 confs | 1d 9h | 31x slower | |
| $401.12 M | X11 @ 2.47 PH/s | 3.96 MW | 80,636 confs | 147d 11h | 3,227x slower | |
| $120.80 M | RandomX @ 120 MH/s | 761 KW | 1,052,420 confs | 2y 37d | 16,794x slower | |
| $87.30 M | KawPow @ 3.70 TH/s | 18 MW | 46,198 confs | 32d 1h | 702x slower | |
| $68.65 M | Eaglesong @ 78 PH/s | 3.81 MW | 1,079,356 confs | 153d 9h | 3,357x slower | |
| $298,294 | RandomX @ 1.61 MH/s | 10 KW | 1,199,181 confs | 158y 26d | 1,262,663x slower | |
| $121,541 | KawPow @ 3.05 GH/s | 15 KW | 115,836,349 confs | 106y 190d | 850,875x slower |