
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.26 T | SHA-256 @ 1,071 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 50m 6s | - | |
| $12.24 B | Scrypt @ 2.35 PH/s | 493 MW | 1,398 confs | 1d 27m | 29x slower | |
| $6.98 B | Equihash @ 19 GH/s | 63 MW | 9,180 confs | 7d 23h | 229x slower | |
| $5.94 B | RandomX @ 5.65 GH/s | 35 MW | 10,352 confs | 14d 3h | 406x slower | |
| $3.90 B | SHA-256 @ 3.20 EH/s | 43 MW | 1,641 confs | 11d 15h | 335x slower | |
| $3.27 B | Scrypt @ 2.74 PH/s | 575 MW | 504 confs | 21h | 25x slower | |
| $1.11 B | Etchash @ 190 TH/s | 390 MW | 8,254 confs | 1d 6h | 37x slower | |
| $469.20 M | X11 @ 1.96 PH/s | 3.14 MW | 88,224 confs | 160d 7h | 4,608x slower | |
| $78.34 M | RandomX @ 68 MH/s | 428 KW | 1,719,690 confs | 3y 79d | 33,753x slower | |
| $65.14 M | KawPow @ 1.47 TH/s | 7.25 MW | 98,253 confs | 69d 8h | 1,994x slower | |
| $49.35 M | Eaglesong @ 83 PH/s | 4.04 MW | 1,006,775 confs | 124d 9h | 3,576x slower | |
| $120,989 | RandomX @ 1.38 MH/s | 8.70 KW | 7,254,017 confs | 158y 177d | 1,662,680x slower | |
| $61,308 | KawPow @ 643 MH/s | 3.17 KW | 457,155,238 confs | 434y 324d | 4,562,428x slower |