
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.57 T | SHA-256 @ 900 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 3m | - | |
| $16.67 B | Scrypt @ 2.19 PH/s | 459 MW | 1,591 confs | 1d 3h | 26x slower | |
| $8.91 B | SHA-256 @ 5.54 EH/s | 74 MW | 984 confs | 7d 3h | 162x slower | |
| $7.06 B | RandomX @ 6.20 GH/s | 39 MW | 10,270 confs | 13d 16h | 311x slower | |
| $6.47 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 46 MW | 13,118 confs | 11d 9h | 259x slower | |
| $4.26 B | Scrypt @ 3.32 PH/s | 697 MW | 490 confs | 18h 22m | 17x slower | |
| $1.33 B | Etchash @ 200 TH/s | 409 MW | 8,388 confs | 1d 7h | 30x slower | |
| $468.84 M | X11 @ 2.94 PH/s | 4.71 MW | 61,870 confs | 113d 3h | 2,578x slower | |
| $95.69 M | KawPow @ 2.12 TH/s | 10 MW | 74,818 confs | 51d 2h | 1,164x slower | |
| $92.08 M | RandomX @ 88 MH/s | 560 KW | 1,418,311 confs | 2y 222d | 21,694x slower | |
| $73.14 M | Eaglesong @ 119 PH/s | 5.78 MW | 732,974 confs | 92d 7h | 2,103x slower | |
| $245,111 | RandomX @ 3.77 MH/s | 23 KW | 1,678,350 confs | 61y 210d | 512,091x slower | |
| $75,274 | KawPow @ 703 MH/s | 3.47 KW | 443,077,571 confs | 421y 181d | 3,505,361x slower |