
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.38 T | SHA-256 @ 981 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 1h 3m | - | |
| $15.78 B | Scrypt @ 3.36 PH/s | 705 MW | 1,131 confs | 19h 47m | 19x slower | |
| $8.91 B | SHA-256 @ 5.93 EH/s | 80 MW | 944 confs | 7d 6h | 165x slower | |
| $6.40 B | RandomX @ 5.97 GH/s | 37 MW | 11,332 confs | 15d 11h | 353x slower | |
| $4.19 B | Scrypt @ 3.05 PH/s | 640 MW | 523 confs | 21h 47m | 21x slower | |
| $3.68 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 46 MW | 14,453 confs | 12d 9h | 282x slower | |
| $1.35 B | Etchash @ 212 TH/s | 435 MW | 8,608 confs | 1d 8h | 30x slower | |
| $434.70 M | X11 @ 2.53 PH/s | 4.07 MW | 78,696 confs | 143d 1m | 3,258x slower | |
| $108.29 M | RandomX @ 110 MH/s | 693 KW | 1,207,543 confs | 2y 108d | 19,107x slower | |
| $92.16 M | KawPow @ 3.34 TH/s | 16 MW | 50,885 confs | 35d 8h | 805x slower | |
| $74.22 M | Eaglesong @ 122 PH/s | 5.92 MW | 800,764 confs | 98d 3h | 2,237x slower | |
| $313,540 | RandomX @ 2.44 MH/s | 15 KW | 1,393,067 confs | 103y 182d | 860,748x slower | |
| $105,045 | KawPow @ 2.18 GH/s | 10 KW | 155,976,388 confs | 148y 138d | 1,233,990x slower |