
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.33 T | SHA-256 @ 910 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 3m | - | |
| $13.93 B | Scrypt @ 2.50 PH/s | 524 MW | 1,388 confs | 1d 40m | 23x slower | |
| $9.22 B | SHA-256 @ 6.35 EH/s | 85 MW | 884 confs | 6d 6h | 143x slower | |
| $5.91 B | RandomX @ 6.51 GH/s | 41 MW | 9,702 confs | 13d 3h | 300x slower | |
| $4.11 B | Scrypt @ 2.71 PH/s | 569 MW | 524 confs | 22h 42m | 22x slower | |
| $3.71 B | Equihash @ 13 GH/s | 43 MW | 14,229 confs | 12d 8h | 282x slower | |
| $1.26 B | Etchash @ 199 TH/s | 408 MW | 8,365 confs | 1d 7h | 30x slower | |
| $405.11 M | X11 @ 2.73 PH/s | 4.37 MW | 67,397 confs | 123d 5h | 2,813x slower | |
| $94.47 M | KawPow @ 3.14 TH/s | 15 MW | 49,404 confs | 34d 21h | 796x slower | |
| $89.10 M | RandomX @ 82 MH/s | 519 KW | 1,493,303 confs | 2y 307d | 23,666x slower | |
| $65.17 M | Eaglesong @ 130 PH/s | 6.32 MW | 737,907 confs | 85d 5h | 1,945x slower | |
| $260,050 | RandomX @ 1.15 MH/s | 7.24 KW | 1,193,796 confs | 203y 309d | 1,697,990x slower | |
| $95,686 | KawPow @ 2.05 GH/s | 10 KW | 153,518,566 confs | 146y 15d | 1,216,470x slower |