
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.26 T | SHA-256 @ 1,008 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 53m 12s | - | |
| $14.26 B | Scrypt @ 2.73 PH/s | 572 MW | 1,186 confs | 21h 5m | 24x slower | |
| $7.58 B | Equihash @ 16 GH/s | 55 MW | 10,394 confs | 9d 32m | 244x slower | |
| $5.97 B | RandomX @ 5.11 GH/s | 32 MW | 10,717 confs | 15d 15h | 423x slower | |
| $4.00 B | SHA-256 @ 2.99 EH/s | 40 MW | 1,662 confs | 12d 11h | 337x slower | |
| $3.39 B | Scrypt @ 2.49 PH/s | 523 MW | 522 confs | 23h 3m | 26x slower | |
| $1.14 B | Etchash @ 185 TH/s | 379 MW | 8,433 confs | 1d 7h | 36x slower | |
| $450.21 M | X11 @ 2.29 PH/s | 3.68 MW | 74,319 confs | 136d 18h | 3,702x slower | |
| $81.88 M | RandomX @ 66 MH/s | 421 KW | 1,719,289 confs | 3y 98d | 32,317x slower | |
| $67.62 M | KawPow @ 1.80 TH/s | 8.87 MW | 81,649 confs | 56d 16h | 1,535x slower | |
| $53.09 M | Eaglesong @ 77 PH/s | 3.74 MW | 1,064,489 confs | 134d 10h | 3,639x slower | |
| $130,555 | RandomX @ 558 KH/s | 3.52 KW | 3,583,875 confs | 392y 26d | 3,873,549x slower | |
| $63,751 | KawPow @ 250 MH/s | 1.23 KW | 1,135,496,337 confs | 1116y 71d | 11,027,690x slower |