
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.27 T | SHA-256 @ 740 EH/s | 10.00 GW | 6 confs | 1h 20m | - | |
| $15.48 B | Scrypt @ 3.14 PH/s | 658 MW | 1,165 confs | 20h 23m | 15x slower | |
| $10.39 B | Equihash @ 16 GH/s | 54 MW | 11,834 confs | 10d 6h | 184x slower | |
| $6.74 B | RandomX @ 5.64 GH/s | 35 MW | 11,159 confs | 15d 18h | 281x slower | |
| $4.83 B | SHA-256 @ 4.29 EH/s | 57 MW | 1,434 confs | 9d 15h | 172x slower | |
| $3.63 B | Scrypt @ 2.51 PH/s | 526 MW | 547 confs | 1d 1h | 19x slower | |
| $1.21 B | Etchash @ 192 TH/s | 394 MW | 9,142 confs | 1d 10h | 25x slower | |
| $495.28 M | X11 @ 3.27 PH/s | 5.25 MW | 59,457 confs | 106d 15h | 1,906x slower | |
| $84.09 M | RandomX @ 70 MH/s | 446 KW | 1,804,814 confs | 3y 158d | 22,392x slower | |
| $77.39 M | KawPow @ 2.22 TH/s | 10 MW | 73,740 confs | 51d 5h | 915x slower | |
| $58.22 M | Eaglesong @ 96 PH/s | 4.67 MW | 1,039,483 confs | 119d 19h | 2,140x slower | |
| $197,793 | RandomX @ 1.09 MH/s | 6.84 KW | 2,971,228 confs | 224y 51d | 1,461,652x slower | |
| $52,418 | KawPow @ 554 MH/s | 2.73 KW | 610,288,742 confs | 561y 77d | 3,659,713x slower |