
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.27 T | SHA-256 @ 1,032 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 57m 48s | - | |
| $13.32 B | Scrypt @ 2.36 PH/s | 495 MW | 1,550 confs | 1d 3h | 28x slower | |
| $6.98 B | Equihash @ 20 GH/s | 69 MW | 9,401 confs | 8d 1h | 201x slower | |
| $6.57 B | RandomX @ 5.19 GH/s | 32 MW | 12,119 confs | 17d 2h | 426x slower | |
| $4.06 B | SHA-256 @ 3.73 EH/s | 50 MW | 1,711 confs | 11d 3h | 277x slower | |
| $3.34 B | Scrypt @ 2.80 PH/s | 588 MW | 545 confs | 22h 51m | 24x slower | |
| $1.12 B | Etchash @ 190 TH/s | 390 MW | 9,097 confs | 1d 10h | 36x slower | |
| $440.21 M | X11 @ 2.93 PH/s | 4.69 MW | 66,030 confs | 119d 5h | 2,970x slower | |
| $75.49 M | RandomX @ 64 MH/s | 404 KW | 2,061,772 confs | 3y 289d | 34,482x slower | |
| $71.23 M | KawPow @ 1.65 TH/s | 8.11 MW | 94,655 confs | 69d 27m | 1,720x slower | |
| $54.81 M | Eaglesong @ 85 PH/s | 4.16 MW | 1,106,055 confs | 134d 14h | 3,353x slower | |
| $122,634 | RandomX @ 2.19 MH/s | 13 KW | 5,768,840 confs | 111y 80d | 1,011,377x slower | |
| $55,408 | KawPow @ 987 MH/s | 4.86 KW | 342,896,377 confs | 315y 117d | 2,867,357x slower |