
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.40 T | SHA-256 @ 1,017 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 1h 1m | - | |
| $14.50 B | Scrypt @ 3.33 PH/s | 698 MW | 1,146 confs | 20h 3m | 20x slower | |
| $8.93 B | SHA-256 @ 6.24 EH/s | 84 MW | 959 confs | 6d 22h | 163x slower | |
| $6.48 B | RandomX @ 6.08 GH/s | 38 MW | 11,272 confs | 15d 6h | 359x slower | |
| $4.15 B | Scrypt @ 3.11 PH/s | 653 MW | 529 confs | 21h 27m | 21x slower | |
| $3.67 B | Equihash @ 17 GH/s | 56 MW | 11,971 confs | 10d 6h | 241x slower | |
| $1.28 B | Etchash @ 197 TH/s | 403 MW | 9,145 confs | 1d 10h | 34x slower | |
| $406.77 M | X11 @ 2.15 PH/s | 3.45 MW | 93,213 confs | 169d 9h | 3,985x slower | |
| $114.52 M | RandomX @ 112 MH/s | 710 KW | 1,183,142 confs | 2y 91d | 19,332x slower | |
| $87.92 M | KawPow @ 3.31 TH/s | 16 MW | 50,794 confs | 35d 20h | 844x slower | |
| $73.13 M | Eaglesong @ 103 PH/s | 5.03 MW | 931,641 confs | 116d 3h | 2,733x slower | |
| $279,015 | RandomX @ 1.28 MH/s | 8.06 KW | 1,199,182 confs | 198y 166d | 1,704,392x slower | |
| $113,788 | KawPow @ 2.53 GH/s | 12 KW | 134,957,342 confs | 128y 140d | 1,102,593x slower |