
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.53 T | SHA-256 @ 961 EH/s | 12 GW | 6 confs | 1h 36s | - | |
| $16.46 B | Scrypt @ 3.37 PH/s | 707 MW | 1,059 confs | 18h 31m | 18x slower | |
| $8.85 B | SHA-256 @ 5.99 EH/s | 80 MW | 993 confs | 6d 18h | 161x slower | |
| $7.00 B | RandomX @ 5.56 GH/s | 34 MW | 11,328 confs | 15d 14h | 371x slower | |
| $5.82 B | Equihash @ 14 GH/s | 49 MW | 12,968 confs | 11d 2h | 264x slower | |
| $4.26 B | Scrypt @ 3.08 PH/s | 646 MW | 558 confs | 20h 18m | 20x slower | |
| $1.31 B | Etchash @ 199 TH/s | 408 MW | 8,562 confs | 1d 8h | 32x slower | |
| $447.88 M | X11 @ 2.32 PH/s | 3.73 MW | 80,648 confs | 146d 13h | 3,482x slower | |
| $96.69 M | RandomX @ 81 MH/s | 514 KW | 1,554,969 confs | 2y 331d | 25,232x slower | |
| $94.40 M | KawPow @ 2.22 TH/s | 10 MW | 72,036 confs | 50d 36m | 1,189x slower | |
| $71.46 M | Eaglesong @ 147 PH/s | 7.15 MW | 596,899 confs | 76d 9h | 1,816x slower | |
| $258,295 | RandomX @ 674 KH/s | 4.24 KW | 1,717,915 confs | 352y 144d | 3,056,433x slower | |
| $46,381 | KawPow @ 548 MH/s | 2.70 KW | 581,881,684 confs | 553y 197d | 4,801,004x slower |