
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.38 T | SHA-256 @ 884 EH/s | 11 GW | 6 confs | 1h 7m | - | |
| $13.94 B | Scrypt @ 2.89 PH/s | 606 MW | 1,246 confs | 22h 9m | 20x slower | |
| $8.73 B | SHA-256 @ 6.30 EH/s | 85 MW | 951 confs | 6d 13h | 140x slower | |
| $6.02 B | RandomX @ 6.61 GH/s | 41 MW | 10,553 confs | 13d 10h | 287x slower | |
| $4.20 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 39 MW | 16,162 confs | 14d 42m | 299x slower | |
| $4.12 B | Scrypt @ 2.67 PH/s | 560 MW | 557 confs | 23h 58m | 21x slower | |
| $1.31 B | Etchash @ 197 TH/s | 404 MW | 8,903 confs | 1d 9h | 30x slower | |
| $380.51 M | X11 @ 1.25 PH/s | 2.00 MW | 152,773 confs | 279d 9h | 5,960x slower | |
| $114.53 M | RandomX @ 105 MH/s | 663 KW | 1,235,181 confs | 2y 113d | 17,994x slower | |
| $91.66 M | KawPow @ 3.05 TH/s | 15 MW | 53,577 confs | 37d 4h | 794x slower | |
| $70.47 M | Eaglesong @ 162 PH/s | 7.90 MW | 575,187 confs | 70d 19h | 1,511x slower | |
| $254,639 | RandomX @ 892 KH/s | 5.62 KW | 1,304,192 confs | 272y 330d | 2,125,027x slower | |
| $91,341 | KawPow @ 1.89 GH/s | 9.30 KW | 173,238,717 confs | 164y 292d | 1,283,250x slower |