
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.37 T | SHA-256 @ 993 EH/s | 13 GW | 6 confs | 1h 2m | - | |
| $13.86 B | Scrypt @ 3.84 PH/s | 806 MW | 993 confs | 17h 22m | 17x slower | |
| $8.89 B | SHA-256 @ 7.21 EH/s | 97 MW | 943 confs | 6d 4m | 138x slower | |
| $6.27 B | RandomX @ 6.26 GH/s | 39 MW | 11,038 confs | 14d 19h | 340x slower | |
| $4.13 B | Scrypt @ 3.22 PH/s | 676 MW | 529 confs | 20h 43m | 20x slower | |
| $3.54 B | Equihash @ 12 GH/s | 41 MW | 16,094 confs | 13d 23h | 321x slower | |
| $1.27 B | Etchash @ 210 TH/s | 431 MW | 8,708 confs | 1d 8h | 31x slower | |
| $405.47 M | X11 @ 2.49 PH/s | 3.99 MW | 81,078 confs | 146d 9h | 3,362x slower | |
| $110.64 M | RandomX @ 121 MH/s | 763 KW | 1,119,933 confs | 2y 34d | 17,564x slower | |
| $86.91 M | KawPow @ 3.84 TH/s | 18 MW | 44,414 confs | 30d 20h | 708x slower | |
| $70.60 M | Eaglesong @ 84 PH/s | 4.09 MW | 1,168,709 confs | 142d 19h | 3,279x slower | |
| $243,376 | RandomX @ 1.71 MH/s | 10 KW | 1,199,181 confs | 149y 8d | 1,249,226x slower | |
| $115,296 | KawPow @ 2.43 GH/s | 11 KW | 140,433,542 confs | 133y 216d | 1,119,885x slower |