
Compares Proof-of-Work across blockchains by converting hashrates into power consumption (watts), then calculating how many confirmations on each chain equal the same amount of work as 6 Bitcoin confirmations. How are these values calculated?
| Name | Market Cap | Hashrate | Power | Equivalent Confs | Estimated Time | Difference |
| $1.63 T | SHA-256 @ 1,092 EH/s | 14 GW | 6 confs | 52m 6s | - | |
| $18.93 B | Scrypt @ 4.90 PH/s | 1.03 GW | 711 confs | 12h 26m | 14x slower | |
| $9.38 B | Equihash @ 19 GH/s | 65 MW | 9,527 confs | 8d 3h | 226x slower | |
| $9.00 B | SHA-256 @ 4.68 EH/s | 63 MW | 1,089 confs | 8d 10h | 234x slower | |
| $7.64 B | RandomX @ 7.11 GH/s | 44 MW | 9,114 confs | 11d 22h | 329x slower | |
| $4.51 B | Scrypt @ 3.03 PH/s | 636 MW | 507 confs | 20h 8m | 23x slower | |
| $1.53 B | Etchash @ 186 TH/s | 380 MW | 8,907 confs | 1d 9h | 39x slower | |
| $595.11 M | X11 @ 2.61 PH/s | 4.19 MW | 69,659 confs | 127d 9h | 3,521x slower | |
| $102.82 M | KawPow @ 1.68 TH/s | 8.27 MW | 91,402 confs | 64d 12h | 1,784x slower | |
| $83.50 M | Eaglesong @ 124 PH/s | 6.04 MW | 752,660 confs | 88d 8h | 2,442x slower | |
| $81.35 M | RandomX @ 72 MH/s | 457 KW | 1,652,428 confs | 3y 71d | 32,245x slower | |
| $239,599 | RandomX @ 618 KH/s | 3.90 KW | 1,678,352 confs | 375y 15d | 3,783,539x slower | |
| $76,095 | KawPow @ 1.30 GH/s | 6.41 KW | 248,042,073 confs | 228y 34d | 2,301,094x slower |